2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian analysis of heavy-tailed market microstructure model and its application in stock markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the year 2007 Ives and Scandol proposed the utilization of Bayesian Analysis [18] which was then used in the methodology by Su and Peterman in 2012 [19], Ticknor in 2013 [20], and later in 2015 it was utilized as part of the methodology by Miao, Wang and Xu [21], Wang et al [22], and Peng et al [5].…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the year 2007 Ives and Scandol proposed the utilization of Bayesian Analysis [18] which was then used in the methodology by Su and Peterman in 2012 [19], Ticknor in 2013 [20], and later in 2015 it was utilized as part of the methodology by Miao, Wang and Xu [21], Wang et al [22], and Peng et al [5].…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e estimation of the MM model is not straightforward, since the market liquidity appears both in the mean term and in the variance term of the model, and the surplus demand is also time-varying stochastic variable. In previous works, the non-linear Kalman filter and maximum likelihood method (see, e.g., [5][6][7][8][9][10]) were used to estimate the parameters of the MM model, but this kind of method has some shortcomings in dealing with strong non-Gaussian non-linear financial data. us, we consider using the MCMC method to improve estimation of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the Kalman filter-based simulation smoother algorithm (see, e.g., De Jong [15]; Koopman [16]; De Jong and Shephard [17]; and Durbin and Koopman [18]) and the auxiliary mixture sampler (see, e.g., Kim et al [19]; Omori et al [20]; Nakajima and Omori [21]; Delatola and Griffin [22]; and Jensen and Maheu [23]) cannot be directly applied to the MM model, since the market liquidity enters the mean term of return equation. To make an efficient posterior inference easier using WinBUGS (Windows version of Bayesian Analysis Using Gibbs Sampler, a statistical software for Bayesian analysis using MCMC methods), Xi et al [8] and Xi et al [10] developed a MCMC method to estimate a MM model. But the status of the chain after a huge number of steps is then used as a sample of the desired distribution, which may lead to complex desired distribution and an inaccurate estimate result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some improvements of the market microstructure model and their estimation approaches as well as applications [20,21] were also presented. Although Peng et al [22,23] and Xi et al [24,25] proposed the generalized market microstructure (GMMS) models, which included jump component for capturing the low-frequency and large-amplitude abnormal vibrations of price, they did not consider the important property, namely, leverage effect. Recently, to explain essential characteristics of skewness and heavy tails, Xi et al [25] proposed the heavy-tailed market microstructure model based on Studentdistribution (MM-).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Peng et al [22,23] and Xi et al [24,25] proposed the generalized market microstructure (GMMS) models, which included jump component for capturing the low-frequency and large-amplitude abnormal vibrations of price, they did not consider the important property, namely, leverage effect. Recently, to explain essential characteristics of skewness and heavy tails, Xi et al [25] proposed the heavy-tailed market microstructure model based on Studentdistribution (MM-). However, all of the above market microstructure models are difficult to explain the asymmetry in the relation between volatility and price/return.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%