2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2008.13704
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian analysis of LIGO-Virgo mergers: Primordial vs. astrophysical black hole populations

Alex Hall,
Andrew D. Gow,
Christian T. Byrnes

Abstract: GW170823FIG. 1: Posterior samples from each of the sources in the O1O2 source catalogue, indicated in each panel. We show samples in the plane of redshifted chirp mass Mz and mass ratio q, marginalised over the other source parameters. Samples have been thinned by a factor of 16 for visual clarity.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the observed merger rate alone constrains the allowed O(30)M PBH DM abundance to be marginal [8,11,12] 1 . Dedicated simulations of PBH evolution in the early Universe [14,15], studies of the formation of small-scale structure [16][17][18][19] as well as several later analyses [20][21][22][23] have confirmed this result. Nevertheless, if the PBHs comprise just a fraction of DM, the primordial hypothesis for the LIGO-Virgo GW events is still physically interesting and motivates further studies of the PBH formation and evolution in the early Universe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, the observed merger rate alone constrains the allowed O(30)M PBH DM abundance to be marginal [8,11,12] 1 . Dedicated simulations of PBH evolution in the early Universe [14,15], studies of the formation of small-scale structure [16][17][18][19] as well as several later analyses [20][21][22][23] have confirmed this result. Nevertheless, if the PBHs comprise just a fraction of DM, the primordial hypothesis for the LIGO-Virgo GW events is still physically interesting and motivates further studies of the PBH formation and evolution in the early Universe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Another intriguing possibility is the PBH scenario, which could explain not only the observed binary black hole (BBH) merger events, but also the fact that many observed BBHs have large mass and low spin [18]. Given the large theoretical uncertainties in predicting the merger rate distribution of the individual astrophysical channels, it is a challenging task to determine how much the PBHs contribute to the observed merger rate distribution from the data (see [40][41][42][43][44][45][46] as recent works along this direction). In order to achieve this, we would ultimately need to reduce the theoretical uncertainties of the astrophysical channels and subtract the astrophysical contributions from the observationally determined merger rate distribution to identify the PBH signal.…”
Section: Underlying Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that to transition from searches for neutron stars spinning down to inspiraling PBHs spinning up, the only modification necessary is to allow k → −k in equation 19.…”
Section: B Generalized Frequency-hough Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a variety of PBH formation scenarios, e.g. the gravitational collapse of inhomogeneities that can be generated during inflation, reheating or phase transitions, that allow PBHs to compose a fraction [17][18][19][20] or all of dark matter in the Universe [15,16,[21][22][23][24][25][26]. In addition to being responsible for forming stellar-mass black holes, the collapse process may also have triggered Baryogenesis in the Universe in pockets surrounding each PBH, and linked the observed baryon-to-photon ratio to the abundance of PBHs at formation [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%