“…By comparison to standard, classical estimates, Bayesian estimators are shrunken in the direction specified by the prior distribution, which in itself is a different form of bias that can be severe if the prior is selected inappropriately. Although Bayesian methods are becoming more mainstream in the QTL mapping community (Satagopan et al, 1996;Uimari and Hoeschele, 1997;Stephens and Fisch, 1998;Yi and Xu, 2000;Sen and Churchill, 2001;Vogl and Xu, 2002;Yi and Xu, 2002;Yi et al, 2003a;Xu, 2003;Kilpikari and Silanpää, 2003;Yi et al, 2003b;Bogdan et al, 2004;Jannink and Fernando, 2004;van de Ven, 2004;Zhang et al, 2005;Hayashi and Awata, 2005), we feel that there is a need for a more systematic investigation of the influence that the choice of priors has on the resulting estimates. Our hope is that work toward solving the bias problem will continue, but our larger hope is that readers will be aware that bias exists in the estimators rendered from QTL mapping methodologies and will view their results with a cautious eye.…”