2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian analysis of quasar light curves with a running optimal average: new time delay measurements of COSMOGRAIL gravitationally lensed quasars

Abstract: We present a new method of modelling time-series data based on the running optimal average (ROA). By identifying the effective number of parameters for the ROA model, in terms of the shape and width of its window function and the times and accuracies of the data, we enable a Bayesian analysis, optimising the ROA width, along with other model parameters, by minimising the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and sampling joint posterior parameter distributions using MCMC methods. For analysis of quasar lightcur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inter-telescope calibration determines telescope-specific scale factors 𝐴 𝑠 , which can arise from differences in the CCD sensitivities and the filter and telescope transmissions, and additive background flux offsets 𝐵 𝑠 , which may arise from different angular aperture sizes or angular resolution. To optimise the inter-calibration parameters we use P ROA 3 (Donnan et al 2021), which models the underlying lightcurve, 𝑋 (𝑡), as a running optimal average (ROA) that is scaled by a factor 𝐴 𝑠 and shifted by 𝐵 𝑠 to fit the flux data over all epochs for telescope 𝑠:…”
Section: Inter-telescope Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inter-telescope calibration determines telescope-specific scale factors 𝐴 𝑠 , which can arise from differences in the CCD sensitivities and the filter and telescope transmissions, and additive background flux offsets 𝐵 𝑠 , which may arise from different angular aperture sizes or angular resolution. To optimise the inter-calibration parameters we use P ROA 3 (Donnan et al 2021), which models the underlying lightcurve, 𝑋 (𝑡), as a running optimal average (ROA) that is scaled by a factor 𝐴 𝑠 and shifted by 𝐵 𝑠 to fit the flux data over all epochs for telescope 𝑠:…”
Section: Inter-telescope Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use P ROA (Donnan et al 2021) to model the flux data of the 7-band LCO lightcurves and determine the inter-band delays. Analysing each year of data separately, we measure delays relative to the 𝑔 -band lightcurve, which has more epochs and higher signalto-noise ratio than the others.…”
Section: P Roamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In combination with the arrival time difference between the different images of the source, the Hubble constant can be constrained assuming a given cosmological model. Other factors, such as the environment surface mass density, the velocity dispersion of the lensing galaxy, and time-delay microlensing effects, also help characterizing H 0 with precision (e.g., Chen et al 2018;Sluse et al 2019;Tihhonova et al 2020;Millon et al 2020;Donnan et al 2021;Liao 2021;Yıldırım et al 2021). e-mail: lyne.vandevyvere@uliege.be While a gravitational lensing analysis requires many ingredients to perform with the best precision, we focus here on the role of the mass model of the lensing galaxy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the parametric family of techniques, examples include Hojjati et al (2013) who perform Gaussian Process (GP) regression to model the intrinsic light curve and Tewes et al (2013) who use a free-knot spline technique. More recently, Bag et al (2021) developed a Bayesian method to identify gravitationally lensed Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from unresolved light curves and measure their time delays, and Donnan et al (2021) propose a time delay estimation method based on a running optimal average (ROA) model for the light curve data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%