2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian and Expectation Maximization methods for multivariate change point detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the main idea of the EM algorithm was introduced in [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Then we make use of the Kalman filtering and Kalman smoothing approaches to derive the iterative computation procedure for the proposed model (1) and (2).…”
Section: Em Algorithm For Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the main idea of the EM algorithm was introduced in [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Then we make use of the Kalman filtering and Kalman smoothing approaches to derive the iterative computation procedure for the proposed model (1) and (2).…”
Section: Em Algorithm For Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of Expectation Maximization (EM) method and Bayesian method for change point detection of multivariate data was done. The Bayesian technique involves fewer computational work, while EM reveals better performance for unsuitable priors and minor changes [25]. Min-max distribution free continuous-review model was presented with a service level constraint and variable lead time [26].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regime switching, mixtures, or applications of change point models in other fields are vastly common especially in finance, economics, engineering, and sciences (Clements and Hendry (1996); Hamilton (2008, Keshavarz and Huang (2014)). In transportation, two state mean adapting model with EM is developed in (Cetin and Comert (2007) and Comert and Bezuglov (2013)) combined a four state HMM, EM, and ARIMA (i.e., Online Change Point Based (OCPB) model) and compared against mean adapting and simple time series models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%