1983
DOI: 10.1364/josa.73.001501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian approach to limited-angle reconstruction in computed tomography

Abstract: An arbitrary source function cannot be determined fully from projection data that are limited in number and range of viewing angle. There exists a null subspace in the Hilbert space of possible source functions about which the available projection measurements provide no information. The null-space components of deterministic solutions are usually zero, giving rise to unavoidable artifacts. It is demonstrated that these artifacts may be reduced by a Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstruction method tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In using these techniques, if the approximate shape of an object to be reconstructed is known beforehand, Bayesian methods of reconstruction can incorporate the known structural characteristics and produce substantially improved reconstructions from limited data. However, if the assumptions about the structural characteristics of the object differ only slightly, the prior that results from such assumptions can lead to very poor reconstructions [Hanson and Wecksung, 1983]. In addition, if the mean of the desired reconstruction varies from that of the prior, the fixed mean of the prior will prevent these structural characteristics to be reflected in the reconstruction.…”
Section: Flexible Prior Models Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In using these techniques, if the approximate shape of an object to be reconstructed is known beforehand, Bayesian methods of reconstruction can incorporate the known structural characteristics and produce substantially improved reconstructions from limited data. However, if the assumptions about the structural characteristics of the object differ only slightly, the prior that results from such assumptions can lead to very poor reconstructions [Hanson and Wecksung, 1983]. In addition, if the mean of the desired reconstruction varies from that of the prior, the fixed mean of the prior will prevent these structural characteristics to be reflected in the reconstruction.…”
Section: Flexible Prior Models Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever prior isused,itsstrength affects theamount thereconstruction isoffset from thetrueimage (Hanson,1990b;Myers and Hanson,1990).ltisimportant tounderstandthecharacteristics ofsolutions obtainedregardless oftheprior chosen.Itisrecognized thatthepriorprovides . the regula.rization essential to solving ill-posed problem's (Nashed, I981;Titterington, 1985), which arise because H possesses a null:space (Hanson and Wecksung, 1983;Hanson, 1987).…”
Section: Posterior Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian reconstruction algorithms are also used and they are known to substantially improve the accuracy of the reconstruction obtained from limited data, if the object under study does not differ very much in size, shape or position from the assumed model. Difficulties arise when the spatial coordinate of the prior model is held fixed relative to the spatial coordinate system of the reconstruction [Hanson and Wecksung, 1983]. A technique that has been used to represent variations in an image being restored for a general class of distortion has been reported by Hanson [1992].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%