Synthesizing Qualitative Research 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781119959847.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Approaches to the Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose Bayesian meta‐analysis (Crandell et al . ) and realist synthesis (Pawson ) methods to achieve the aims of our study because of their inclusiveness and flexibility in managing methodologically diverse and incomparable data sets and sample sizes and because they allow qualitative and quantitative findings to play equally important roles in all phases of a research synthesis study. Bayesian methods are directed largely towards the synthesis of findings by aggregation, thereby yielding summative statements on relationships among variables; realist methods are directed largely towards the synthesis of findings by configuration, thereby yielding explanations for how they are related (Sandelowski et al .…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose Bayesian meta‐analysis (Crandell et al . ) and realist synthesis (Pawson ) methods to achieve the aims of our study because of their inclusiveness and flexibility in managing methodologically diverse and incomparable data sets and sample sizes and because they allow qualitative and quantitative findings to play equally important roles in all phases of a research synthesis study. Bayesian methods are directed largely towards the synthesis of findings by aggregation, thereby yielding summative statements on relationships among variables; realist methods are directed largely towards the synthesis of findings by configuration, thereby yielding explanations for how they are related (Sandelowski et al .…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as we want unbiased opinions, we separate the qualitative evidence from the prior probability. The previous methods implemented in health research do not differentiate between the types of evidence [9]- [11]. It leaves it up to the researchers/practitioners to decide how they want to evaluate the evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two approaches called "quantitizing" [11] and "qualitizing" [9] have been proposed in health research. However, these approaches do not address the EBSE recommendation of incorporating subjective opinion into the synthesis hence, not discussed further.…”
Section: B Bayesian Synthesis In Health Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations