2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesit.2014.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian based adaptive question generation technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are also restricted regarding their cognitive level, where the majority of the generated questions in Alsubait et al (2014), Al-Yahya (2014), Papasalouros et al (2008), Ellampallil and Kumar (2017), Žitko et al (2009) test only students' ability to recall learned information (e.g., memorising definitions). This has also been highlighted by Khodeir et al (2014) who stated that "factual and definitional questions are the common types of questions in these [current] approaches". There is a lack of questions that test higher forms of thinking such as applying learned knowledge to new situations, analysing learned knowledge and applying one's judgement which are valuable in many curricula (Tractenberg et al 2013).…”
Section: Related Approachesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They are also restricted regarding their cognitive level, where the majority of the generated questions in Alsubait et al (2014), Al-Yahya (2014), Papasalouros et al (2008), Ellampallil and Kumar (2017), Žitko et al (2009) test only students' ability to recall learned information (e.g., memorising definitions). This has also been highlighted by Khodeir et al (2014) who stated that "factual and definitional questions are the common types of questions in these [current] approaches". There is a lack of questions that test higher forms of thinking such as applying learned knowledge to new situations, analysing learned knowledge and applying one's judgement which are valuable in many curricula (Tractenberg et al 2013).…”
Section: Related Approachesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We have not considered evaluating EMCQG in comparison to existing approaches for the following reasons. The questions generated by EMCQG are more complex than questions generated by the approaches outlined in Wang et al (2007), Karamanis et al (2006), Khodeir et al (2014), and thus, the performance is not comparable. We also did not compare our questions with the case-based questions produced by Gierl et al (2012) because this approach is mainly dependent on domain experts as explained in the section titled "Related Approaches".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations