2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2022.100389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian based similarity assessment of nanomaterials to inform grouping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the methodology and the R script, they were tested in a proof-of-concept exercise against a literature-based dataset for immobilization. The method was also validated against other methods in (Jeliazkova et al, 2021) in this same issue, results were also consistent with conclusions from other methods applied to the same data in the GRACIOUS project (Tsiliki et al, 2021). This confirmed the validity and the soundness of the proposed approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To demonstrate the methodology and the R script, they were tested in a proof-of-concept exercise against a literature-based dataset for immobilization. The method was also validated against other methods in (Jeliazkova et al, 2021) in this same issue, results were also consistent with conclusions from other methods applied to the same data in the GRACIOUS project (Tsiliki et al, 2021). This confirmed the validity and the soundness of the proposed approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…To support the grouping, GRACIOUS has also proposed an array of methods to assess similarity between NFs in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic physicochemical characteristics as well as toxicity, either via a pairwise analysis conducted property-by-property, or by assessing all relevant properties and hazard endpoints simultaneously via multidimensional analysis (Jeliazkova et al, 2021). Such methods are based for example on an x-fold comparison (Janer et al, 2021), Euclidean distance, Bayesian logic (Tsiliki et al, 2021) or clustering methods (Jeliazkova et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 B). The values presented are scaled between 0 and 1, where 1 indicates identical curves, while values above or equal to 0.7 indicate highly similar NFs [ 26 ]. The yellow and light orange colors (from light orange: 0.7 to yellow: 0.5) represent the comparison of mesoporous NFs to the other NFs suggesting that these silica NFs cannot be considered as a single group i.e., they are not highly similar according to the BF analysis but as two groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aim was to apply different methods for assessing similarity to support a quantitative similarity assessment. The details of these methods are described elsewhere [ 9 , 26 ] but were applied here to demonstrate their usefulness. The data provided by the case study allowed for the testing of two approaches the BF and the clustering analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation