2017
DOI: 10.5194/bg-14-4295-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian calibration of terrestrial ecosystem models: a study of advanced Markov chain Monte Carlo methods

Abstract: Abstract. Calibration of terrestrial ecosystem models is important but challenging. Bayesian inference implemented by Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling provides a comprehensive framework to estimate model parameters and associated uncertainties using their posterior distributions. The effectiveness and efficiency of the method strongly depend on the MCMC algorithm used. In this work, a differential evolution adaptive Metropolis (DREAM) algorithm is used to estimate posterior distributions of 21 paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional fine tuning did not significantly affect the cost function value. More details about the QPSO algorithm and calibration approach are provided in Lu et al (2017).…”
Section: Model Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional fine tuning did not significantly affect the cost function value. More details about the QPSO algorithm and calibration approach are provided in Lu et al (2017).…”
Section: Model Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We probabilistically addressed the varying degrees of uncertainty (variety of species, drought scenarios, methods, and scales) of the three image-based modeling approaches (Table 1) using Bayesian statistical approaches (Link et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2009;Xu et al, 2015;Anderegg et al, 2016;Ryu et al, 2019). Hierarchical Bayesian approaches provide robust, testable predictions from the data in hand while allowing for probabilistic testing of false positives interacting with model complexity and probabilistic exploration of measurement error (Olejnik and Algina, 1983;Press, 2005;Lu et al, 2017). Both of these benefits are crucial when using different types of measurements to increase transparency in the analyses and inferences using explicit priors and credible intervals to better explain the variation in the data (Samanta et al, 2007;Ogle and Barber, 2008;Quaife and Cripps, 2016;King et al, 2019;Phillipson et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving predictive understanding of Earth system variability and change requires datamodel integration. For example, Bilionis et al (2015) improved Community Land Model (CLM) prediction of crop productivity after model calibration; Müller et al (2015) improved the CLM prediction of methane emission after parameter optimization; and Fox et al (2009) and Lu et al (2017) improved the terrestrial ecosystem model predictive credibility of carbon fluxes after uncertainty quantification. However, data-model integration methods are usually computationally expensive involving a large ensemble of model simulations, which prohibits their application to complex Earth system models (ESMs) with lengthy simulation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%