2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.123017
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian constraints on the astrophysical neutrino source population from IceCube data

Abstract: We present constraints on an astrophysical population of neutrino sources imposed by recent data from the IceCube neutrino observatory. By using the IceCube point source search method to model the detection of sources, our detection criterion is more sensitive than using the observation of high-energy neutrino multiplets for source identification. We frame the problem as a Bayesian hierarchical model to connect the high-level population parameters to the IceCube data, allowing us to consistently account for al… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, if we only consider contributions from blazar flares, we expect Y νγ ∼ 10 −3 -10 −1 to be consistent with one neutrino-blazar flare coincidence in 10 years of observations. However, in Capel et al (2020), we demonstrated that rare and bright blazars capable of fulfilling these scenarios are also strongly constrained by the non-observation of point sources, further complicating the physical picture (consistent with Yuan et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, if we only consider contributions from blazar flares, we expect Y νγ ∼ 10 −3 -10 −1 to be consistent with one neutrino-blazar flare coincidence in 10 years of observations. However, in Capel et al (2020), we demonstrated that rare and bright blazars capable of fulfilling these scenarios are also strongly constrained by the non-observation of point sources, further complicating the physical picture (consistent with Yuan et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…All sources of interest belong to some class of sources with similar properties and so the two are inextricably linked. General constraints on the density and effective luminosity of an unknown source population can be derived by requiring it to be able to produce the total astrophysical neutrino flux seen by IceCube, without containing individual sources that would have been detected by previous point source searches of the integrated data (Murase & Waxman 2016;Capel et al 2020). However, to study these proposed associations in a meaningful way, a more specific modelling of the population and its multimessenger connections is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is predicted that astrophysical neutrinos are produced in the highest energy extragalactic sources such as the super-massive black holes at the centre of active galactic nuclei [46,47], the collapse of massive stars in gamma ray bursts [48,49], or in star burst galaxies [50]. Although some potential points sources have been identified and there is growing evidence for the blazar connection [51,52], the exact nature of astrophysical neutrino sources remain uncertain [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62].…”
Section: Neutrino Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To place our constraints, we make use of the point source search results reported in [21] together with the diffuse flux characterisation detailed in [22,23], as these are based on the same underlying event sample. This analysis is detailed in [3], with the code also available as the nu_pop GitHub repository . Here, we briefly summarise the resulting constraints in Figure 2, for the case of two priors on the source density evolution, encompassing both plausible positive and negative evolutions.…”
Section: Francesca Capelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ideas can also be applied to other multi-messenger associations. A full exposition can be found in [3] and [4], but we present some motivating factors and simplified calculations in this work. In Section 2, we discuss developments in the statistical methods used to evaluate individual source-event coincidences and how more information can be brought into the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%