2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13349-021-00541-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian damage identification based on autoregressive model and MH-PSO hybrid MCMC sampling method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applicability of this method to damage assessment was verified in the case analysis of a bridge hanger. Luo et al [183] introduced the PSO algorithm into the MH sampling method, and called it the MH-PSO hybrid MCMC sampling method. Numerical damage recognition results showed that the method had enhanced sampling efficiency and damage recognition ability.…”
Section: Bayesian Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicability of this method to damage assessment was verified in the case analysis of a bridge hanger. Luo et al [183] introduced the PSO algorithm into the MH sampling method, and called it the MH-PSO hybrid MCMC sampling method. Numerical damage recognition results showed that the method had enhanced sampling efficiency and damage recognition ability.…”
Section: Bayesian Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two experimental examples with strong nonlinearities, i.e., a 2-D steel frame building and a 3-D isolated bridge, were used to validate the method, with results showing that the proposed method could be used to calibrate large and complex hysteretic FE models. Luo et al [107] focused on the improvement of the MCMC sampling method and obtaining damage identification accuracy, proposing a novel and effective sampling method called the MH-PSO hybrid MCMC sampling method. The damage identification poster PDF objective function was also constructed based on the autoregressive model, and the related work was able to enhance the damage identification accuracy greatly.…”
Section: Bayesian Inference-based Model Updating Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its good time series fitting ability, AR coefficients are usually employed to analyze dynamic signals (Luo et al, 2022; Svendsen et al, 2022). Therefore, it is feasible to identify structural damage by constructing a damage index with AR coefficients.…”
Section: Structural Damage Identification Based On Nmfbi-ar and Cnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal coefficient of the structure is 23.6 × 10 −6 /°C. Then, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm (Luo et al, 2022) is utilized to update the model based on the measured frequencies and mode shapes in the intact state. The updated results about frequencies and MACs of the experimental and numerical model are summarized in Table 5.…”
Section: Application Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%