2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019jb017510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Dynamic Finite‐Fault Inversion: 1. Method and Synthetic Test

Abstract: Dynamic earthquake source inversions aim to determine the spatial distribution of initial stress and friction parameters leading to dynamic rupture models that reproduce observed ground motion data. Such inversions are challenging, particularly due to their high computational burden; thus, so far, only few attempts have been made. Using a highly efficient rupture simulation code, we introduce a novel method to generate a representative sample of acceptable dynamic models from which dynamic source parameters an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also show temporal snapshots of the slip rates (Figures c and d, respectively) and SRFs from six selected points (Figure e) depicted by black stars in Figures a and b. The similarity of our MAP slip rate solution to the target SIV model is very satisfactory, especially when we consider that the original SRFs stem from a dynamic rupture simulation (Gallovič et al, ; Mai et al, ).…”
Section: Application To a Synthetic Testmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also show temporal snapshots of the slip rates (Figures c and d, respectively) and SRFs from six selected points (Figure e) depicted by black stars in Figures a and b. The similarity of our MAP slip rate solution to the target SIV model is very satisfactory, especially when we consider that the original SRFs stem from a dynamic rupture simulation (Gallovič et al, ; Mai et al, ).…”
Section: Application To a Synthetic Testmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The PT sampling algorithm is similar to the simulated annealing method (Kirkpatrick et al, ), modifying the posterior PDF by an additional parameter called temperature γ ≥ 1. The random samples are then drawn following such modified posterior PDF assuming multiple values of temperature γ (multiple parallel trans‐D Markov chains), while at least one chain has γ = 1 (see also Valentová et al, ; Gallovič et al, & Gallovič et al, ). The acceptance probabilities for perturb, birth, and death moves in equations – with canceled homogenous prior PDFs are then modified as follows: αP()bold-italicmbold-italicm',γ=min()1,0.5emp()|bold-italicdbold-italicobsbold-italicm'p()|bold-italicdbold-italicobsm1γ0.25em, αB(),bold-italicmbold-italicmγ=min(),10.5emkk+1p()|bold-italicdbold-italicobsbold-italicmp()|bold-italicdbold-italicobsm1γ, αD(),bold-italicmbold-italicmγ=min(),10.5emkk1p()|bold-italicdbold-italicobsbold-italicmp()|bold-italicdbold-italicobsm1γ. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The waveform comparisons show very good agreement between simulations and observations, although not all details of the recordings are reproduced. However, this does not come as a surprise, because our study does not attempt to find an optimized source parameterization to fit waveforms (in distinction to kinematic (e.g., Cotton & Campillo, ) or dynamic source inversions (Gallovic et al, , )). Still, our synthetic waveforms capture the main S wave pulses, amplitudes, and shaking duration, indicating the quality of dynamic rupture model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Here we aim to reconcile the ambiguity of the various stress drop definitions/measures utilizing a synthetic earthquake database based on dynamic rupture modeling. To generate the event database, we employ a framework that is similar to a Bayesian dynamic source inversion (Gallovič et al, 2019a(Gallovič et al, , 2019b, where GMPEs serve as data instead of waveforms of a single event. In particular, Markov chain Monte Carlo technique samples the dynamic source parameters of linear slip-weakening friction law with heterogeneous distribution on a fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%