2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian estimation of true prevalence, sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tests for detection of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle feces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this current study, diagnostic sensitivity of CUL was slightly greater than that of PCR-CUL, however, their 95% confident intervals overlapped. Conversely, the diagnostic specificity of CUL and PCR-CUL in this study were comparable to those seen in the Ekong et al (2017) and Ekong et al (2018) studies. While pooling decreased sensitivity for both tests, testing FP and BP by PCR-CUL produce comparable estimates of sensitivity, pending further testing of the IF sample constituting the positive pools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this current study, diagnostic sensitivity of CUL was slightly greater than that of PCR-CUL, however, their 95% confident intervals overlapped. Conversely, the diagnostic specificity of CUL and PCR-CUL in this study were comparable to those seen in the Ekong et al (2017) and Ekong et al (2018) studies. While pooling decreased sensitivity for both tests, testing FP and BP by PCR-CUL produce comparable estimates of sensitivity, pending further testing of the IF sample constituting the positive pools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Posterior estimates of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for CUL and PCR-CUL methods for the detection of fecal Salmonella in adult dairy cows showed high and comparable results for IF samples, FP, and BP samples. The diagnostic specificity of CUL and PCR-CUL tests observed in the current study are comparable in magnitude to those recorded for culture and PCR methods for the detection of other foodborne fecal pathogens, Escherichia coli O157 and non-O157 serogroups (Ekong et al, 2017;Ekong et al, 2018). In the Ekong et al (2017) and Ekong et al (2018) studies, diagnostic sensitivity of the quantitative PCR method was greater than that of culture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lower cfu counts can be detected with decreased sensitivity. IMS has a specificity of 99% ( Ekong et al, 2017 ), and all positive isolates were confirmed as such by the Scottish E. coli Reference Laboratory. For the positive/negative analysis, an E. coli O157 positive cow was defined as one that tested positive by IMS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%