2008
DOI: 10.1080/09613210701544061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian estimation of visual discomfort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PMP does not include a maximum recommended lighting level for illuminance, but we feel that overlighting is an issue that needs to be addressed. Lindelöf and Morel have shown through Bayesian estimation based on lab studies that 2500 lx is the upper illuminance level at which the probability of occupant discomfort jumps up [66]. While an upper illuminance level is important to consider for occupant visual comfort, ideally the electric light contribution toward illuminance (including both task and general lighting) in an office environment should be zero when sufficient daylight exists or kept at or slightly above the recommended minimums outlined in the PMP when sufficient daylight is not available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PMP does not include a maximum recommended lighting level for illuminance, but we feel that overlighting is an issue that needs to be addressed. Lindelöf and Morel have shown through Bayesian estimation based on lab studies that 2500 lx is the upper illuminance level at which the probability of occupant discomfort jumps up [66]. While an upper illuminance level is important to consider for occupant visual comfort, ideally the electric light contribution toward illuminance (including both task and general lighting) in an office environment should be zero when sufficient daylight exists or kept at or slightly above the recommended minimums outlined in the PMP when sufficient daylight is not available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier, Newsham (1994) used the solar intensity of 233 W/m² as the predictor variable whereas Reinhart (2004) found 50 W/m². Conversely, Lindelöf and Morel (2008) adopted 800 to 1200 lux on the horizontal work-plane to estimate visual discomfort in small offices for both blinds and lighting controls in their probability model, which was consistent with a probability model developed by Haldi and Robinson (2010). These findings were not applied in this study for the illuminance thresholds; since this study assumed that the vertical illuminance would also be a significant predictor variable.…”
Section: Stage 3: Thresholds and Blind Schedulingsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Aoki et al applied Bayesian Network to analyze how local thermal comfort would influence whole body thermal comfort level [40]. In the visual environment area, Lindelöf used the Bayesian approach to estimate the visual discomfort probability as a function of the illuminance under the office settings [41]. Sadeghi et al applied Bayesian classification and inference models to develop probability distributions of occupants' preference about the visual environment (prefer darker, brighter, or no change) [42].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%