2014
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2014.935377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian estimation with integrated nested Laplace approximation for binary logit mixed models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The INLA approach avoids the computational burden related to typical Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques (Gilks et al, 1998) often used to fit Bayesian spatial models and allows accurate approximations to posterior marginal distributions of the model parameters (Grilli et al, 2014).…”
Section: Multilevel Spatial Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The INLA approach avoids the computational burden related to typical Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques (Gilks et al, 1998) often used to fit Bayesian spatial models and allows accurate approximations to posterior marginal distributions of the model parameters (Grilli et al, 2014).…”
Section: Multilevel Spatial Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As usual in Bayesian software, the inla function allows us to specify the prior distribution of the precision, instead of the variance. We avoid the default gamma prior Ga(1, 0.0005) because it has a poor performance in logistic models with nested random effects [14]. For the simulation study we choose two alternative priors for the precisions: Ga(0.001,0.001), namely the standard choice in the popular BUGS software, and Ga(0.5, 0.003737) specified according to the criterion proposed by Fong et al [10], which consists in setting the parameters of the Gamma in order to obtain a given marginal distribution for the random effects.…”
Section: Estimation Methods and Prior Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major disadvantage or limitation of this method is that the computational cost increases in the form of exponential function when hyper-parameters are increased [20] [21].…”
Section: Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%