2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian geological and geophysical data fusion for the construction and uncertainty quantification of 3D geological models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi‐view representation is a projection‐based network [25]. The traditional methodology for 3D view model uses quantitative technique blended with qualitative techniques [37]. Simple orthographic projections in engineering drawings are used to determine the 3D view of an object [14, 21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multi‐view representation is a projection‐based network [25]. The traditional methodology for 3D view model uses quantitative technique blended with qualitative techniques [37]. Simple orthographic projections in engineering drawings are used to determine the 3D view of an object [14, 21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major axis to minor axis ratio of an ellipse is 4:3 since this is the aspect ratio of images. Prior knowledge of the 3D view can be identified by the probability distribution of parameters [37]. Major parameter is the reference points r 0 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Obsidian distributed inversion code (McCalman et al, 2014) implemented a geological model of a layered sedimentary basin with explicit unit boundaries to explore geothermal potential (Beardsmore et al, 2016); it supported multiple geophysical sensors and used a distributed parallel-tempered MCMC sampler to draw from the multi-modal posteriors that may arise in underconstrained inverse problems. Obsidian has been extended with new within-chain MCMC proposals inside the parallel-tempered framework (Scalzo et al, 2019) and a new sensor likelihood for field observations of surface lithostratigraphy (Olierook et al, 2020); however, the limitations of its geological model make it an unlikely engine for general-purpose inversions. Wellmann et al (2017) present a more general workflow that uses GeoModeller to render the geology, Noddy for calculation of geophysical fields, and pymc2 (Patil et al, 2010) for MCMC sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bayesian methodology provides a probabilistic approach for the estimation of unknown parameters in complex models (Sambridge, 1999;Neal, 1996;Chandra et al, 2019b). We can view a deterministic geophysical forward model as a probabilistic model via Bayesian inference, which is also known as Bayesian inversion, which has been used for landscape evolution (Chandra et al, 2019a, c), geological reef evolution models (Pall et al, 2020), and other geoscientific models (Sambridge, 1999(Sambridge, , 2013Scalzo et al, 2019;Olierook et al, 2020). Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling is typically used to implement Bayesian inference that involves the estimation and uncertainty quantification of unknown parameters (Hastings, 1970;Metropolis et al, 1953;Neal, 2012Neal, , 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%