Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3284432.3284438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Inference of Self-intention Attributed by Observer

Abstract: Most of agents that learn policy for tasks with reinforcement learning (RL) lack the ability to communicate with people, which makes human-agent collaboration challenging. We believe that, in order for RL agents to comprehend utterances from human colleagues, RL agents must infer the mental states that people attribute to them because people sometimes infer an interlocutor's mental states and communicate on the basis of this mental inference. This paper proposes PublicSelf model, which is a model of a person w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the simulation study over 2,500 conditions is complementary to the user study with a small number of conditions, the data-driven artificial observers have an inference structure different from people, which can yield different results. For example, in our previous study ( Fukuchi et al, 2018 ), people occasionally doubted the assumption that the actor intends to get either an apple or a pear and lost confidence on their answers, which never happens in simulation. Moreover, people can be affected by former trials while the artificial observers does not change after training phase.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the simulation study over 2,500 conditions is complementary to the user study with a small number of conditions, the data-driven artificial observers have an inference structure different from people, which can yield different results. For example, in our previous study ( Fukuchi et al, 2018 ), people occasionally doubted the assumption that the actor intends to get either an apple or a pear and lost confidence on their answers, which never happens in simulation. Moreover, people can be affected by former trials while the artificial observers does not change after training phase.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…where a is an action performed by the actor, and belief b t is a probability distribution representing the probability that the environmental state is s t The PublicSelf model extended BToM to an actor's secondorder belief inference (Fukuchi et al, 2018). We can consider PublicSelf as a computational model of an actor's public self-awareness.…”
Section: Computational Theory Of Mind Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the behavior of a person who gives instructions provides plenty of information about her/his goal. An IA motion can also affect the g human because a person sometimes tries to infer an artificial agent's mental states on the basis of mere observations of IA behavior [37], [38]. When a person tries to infer a g agent to provide instructions, an IA may need to infer how its own motion is considered by people.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%