2019
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian meta‐analysis across genome‐wide association studies of diverse phenotypes

Abstract: Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) are a powerful tool for understanding the genetic basis of diseases and traits, but most studies have been conducted in isolation, with a focus on either a single or a set of closely related phenotypes. We describe MetABF, a simple Bayesian framework for performing integrative meta‐analysis across multiple GWAS using summary statistics. The approach is applicable across a wide range of study designs and can increase the power by 50% compared with standard frequentist test… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under model NULL the effect is not present in either of the migraine subtypes (i.e., the effect is zero); under model MO or MA the effect is present only in MO or only in MA but not in both; and under model BOTH, a non-zero effect is shared by both MO and MA. We used a Bayesian approach for model comparison that combines a bivariate Gaussian prior distribution on the two effect sizes with a bivariate Gaussian approximation to the likelihood using GWAS summary statistics (Trochet et al, 2019). Across all models, the prior standard deviation for the effect is 0.2 on the log-odds scale for non-zero effects and 0 for a zero effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under model NULL the effect is not present in either of the migraine subtypes (i.e., the effect is zero); under model MO or MA the effect is present only in MO or only in MA but not in both; and under model BOTH, a non-zero effect is shared by both MO and MA. We used a Bayesian approach for model comparison that combines a bivariate Gaussian prior distribution on the two effect sizes with a bivariate Gaussian approximation to the likelihood using GWAS summary statistics (Trochet et al, 2019). Across all models, the prior standard deviation for the effect is 0.2 on the log-odds scale for non-zero effects and 0 for a zero effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reflect the sparsity of genetic effects, we randomly selected p 0 = 100 of the p = 7, 563 variants to be causal. Motivated by Trochet et al [41], we drew the causal effect sizes from a bivariate normal distribution to model the similarity of genetic effects between ancestries. Denoting to be the indices of the causal SNPs, and we have the equation where ρ is the correlation between the ancestry-specific genetic effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary statistics were downloaded from the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog 82 for the studies GCST007362/GCST007361 83 , GCST001345 84 , GCST000563 85 , GCST007361 83 , GCST007844 86 , GCST001149 87 , GCST005529 88 , GCST008910 89 , GCST003097 90 , and GCST010481 91 downloaded on 04/09/2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%