2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00699.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Model Averaging in the Context of Spatial Hedonic Pricing: An Application to Farmland Values

Abstract: Specification uncertainty arises in spatial hedonic pricing models because economic theory provides no guide in choosing the spatial weighting matrix and explanatory variables. Our objective in this paper is to investigate whether we can resolve uncertainty in the application of a spatial hedonic pricing model. We employ Bayesian Model Averaging in combination with Markov Chain, Monte Carlo Model Composition. The proposed methodology provides inclusion probabilities for explanatory variables and weighting matr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Triplett (1991) points out, if the commodity quality encompasses many characteristics, or the commodity is complex in its use, the hedonic pricing model is easily vulnerable to missing variable bias. Important determinants of farmland value that have been identified in the literature include: productivity (e.g., soil quality) and profitability (Sandrey et al 1982, Boisvert, Schmit, and Regmi 1997, Moss 1997, Huang et al 2006), farm size (Sandrey et al 1982, Huang et al 2006, Cotteleer, Stobbe, and van Kooten 2011), inflation (Moss 1997), environmental vulnerability (Boisvert, Schmit, and Regmi 1997, Schlenker, Hanemann, and Fisher 2006, Mendelsohn and Reinsborough 2007), land use policy (Nickerson and Lynch 2001), location and proximity (Boisvert, Schmit, and Regmi 1997, Huang et al 2006, Cotteleer, Stobbe, and van Kooten 2011, Abelairas-Etxebarria and Astorkiza 2012), land price volatility (Cotteleer, Stobbe, and van Kooten 2011), and local demographics (Huang et al 2006, Salois, Moss, and Erickson 2012, Awasthi 2014). Though subject to data availability, the empirical model in this paper takes into account the majority of these factors.…”
Section: Spatial Valuation Of Farmlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Triplett (1991) points out, if the commodity quality encompasses many characteristics, or the commodity is complex in its use, the hedonic pricing model is easily vulnerable to missing variable bias. Important determinants of farmland value that have been identified in the literature include: productivity (e.g., soil quality) and profitability (Sandrey et al 1982, Boisvert, Schmit, and Regmi 1997, Moss 1997, Huang et al 2006), farm size (Sandrey et al 1982, Huang et al 2006, Cotteleer, Stobbe, and van Kooten 2011), inflation (Moss 1997), environmental vulnerability (Boisvert, Schmit, and Regmi 1997, Schlenker, Hanemann, and Fisher 2006, Mendelsohn and Reinsborough 2007), land use policy (Nickerson and Lynch 2001), location and proximity (Boisvert, Schmit, and Regmi 1997, Huang et al 2006, Cotteleer, Stobbe, and van Kooten 2011, Abelairas-Etxebarria and Astorkiza 2012), land price volatility (Cotteleer, Stobbe, and van Kooten 2011), and local demographics (Huang et al 2006, Salois, Moss, and Erickson 2012, Awasthi 2014). Though subject to data availability, the empirical model in this paper takes into account the majority of these factors.…”
Section: Spatial Valuation Of Farmlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are different specifications of a spatial weight matrix (SWM), the SWM with Delaunay routine (Zhang and Murayama 2000), which defines k-order neighbors as the vertices of non-overlapping triangles, is considered to have an advantage over distance-based SWM when parcel sizes are heterogeneous (Cotteleer et al 2011). This SWM based on Delaunay routine is widely used in the literature (for example see Lesage and Fischer 2008;Conway et al 2010;Chadourne et al 2013).…”
Section: Spatial Hedonic Pricing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu araştırmaların ise çoğunlukla yüksek lisans ve doktora tezi kapsamında gerçekleştirildiği belirlenmiştir (Tanrıvermiş, 1996;Birinci, 1997;Engindeniz, 1998;Keskin, 2003;Aydın, 2007;Hurma, 2007;Avcı, 2010, Baştürk, 2011Karakayacı, 2011). Ancak son yıllarda özellikle kamulaştırmalarda farklı kurumların yararlanabilmesi amacıyla bazı çalışmaların da gerçekleştirildiği görülmektedir (Engindeniz, 2001a;Tanrıvermiş vd., 2008;Engindeniz vd., 2009;Tanrı-vermiş vd., 2011;Tanrıvermiş vd., 2012) Diğer taraftan, bugüne kadar farklı ülkelerde tarım arazilerinin fiyat ve değer analizine yönelik olarak yapılan çok sayıda araştırmada hedonik fiyat analizinden yararlanıldığı görülmektedir (Maddison, 2000;Lake and Easter, 2002;Kostov, 2009;Shultz, 2010;Cotteleer et al, 2011;Ma and Swinton, 2012;O'Donoghue et al, 2015;Joshi et al, 2017;Solhee et al, 2017). Türkiye'de ise tarım arazilerinin değerlemesinde hedonik fiyat analizinden yararlanan sınırlı sayıda araştırmanın yapıldığı belirlenmiştir (Hurma, 2007;Vural, 2007;Vural ve Fidan, 2009;Karakayacı, 2011, Öztürk;2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified