Macroeconomics at the Service of Public Policy 2013
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199666126.003.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Model Averaging, Learning, and Model Selection*

Abstract: Agents have two forecasting models, one consistent with the unique rational expectations equilibrium, another that assumes a time-varying parameter structure. When agents use Bayesian updating to choose between models in a self-referential system, we find that learning dynamics lead to selection of one of the two models. However, there are parameter regions for which the non-rational forecasting model is selected in the long-run. A key structural parameter governing outcomes measures the degree of expectations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A plausible learning algorithm could entail an endogenous switch between di¤erent gains, depending perhaps on the forecasting performance of the implied beliefs. Building on ideas …rst proposed by Brock and Hommes (1997), Marcet and Nicolini (2003), Evans, Honkapohja, Sargent, and Williams (2012) and Milani (2014) implement versions of such an algorithm.…”
Section: Further Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plausible learning algorithm could entail an endogenous switch between di¤erent gains, depending perhaps on the forecasting performance of the implied beliefs. Building on ideas …rst proposed by Brock and Hommes (1997), Marcet and Nicolini (2003), Evans, Honkapohja, Sargent, and Williams (2012) and Milani (2014) implement versions of such an algorithm.…”
Section: Further Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, when β < 1/2 ⇔ c > 1/2, then y t is already close toȳ and hence convergence towards it is slow. Indeed, the threshold of 1/2 is reminiscent of a similar boundary discussed in Evans et al (2013). In view of the aforementioned trade-o between the behaviour of a t and that of β T , one should expect the converse for the performance of β T .…”
Section: ȳ)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Christopeit & Massmann (2010) for details. Indeed, while most of the models in the literature presume that β ∈ (0, 1), there are some that consider negative values; see, for example, Evans, Honkapohja, Sargent & Williams (2013) and Brock & Hommes (1997) who analyse cobweb-type models with −0.5 < β < 1 and β < −1, respectively. With the question of convergence under decreasing gain settled, it is surprising that the second of the two questions above has to-date only received scarce attention in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis is inspired by the previous work of Evans, Honkapohja, Sargent, and Williams (2013). They study a standard cobweb model, in which a single agent considers two models, one with constant parameters and one with time-varying parameters.…”
Section: To Believe Is To Seementioning
confidence: 99%