2015
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2015.2419072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Model Selection for Pathological Neuroimaging Data Applied to White Matter Lesion Segmentation

Abstract: In neuroimaging studies, pathologies can present themselves as abnormal intensity patterns. Thus, solutions for detecting abnormal intensities are currently under investigation. As each patient is unique, an unbiased and biologically plausible model of pathological data would have to be able to adapt to the subject's individual presentation. Such a model would provide the means for a better understanding of the underlying biological processes and improve one's ability to define pathologically meaningful imagin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

9
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This precluded quantitative comparison of interval change in WMH between scans. Regional quantification of WMH in the cadaveric MRI FLAIR sequence was performed using segmentation and localization analyses as previously described (Sudre et al, 2017, 2015; Sudre, Cardoso, & Ourselin, 2017) (see Supplementary Material). This allowed quantification of WMH burden in each lobe and within different cortical and subcortical “layers”, guiding selection of regions for histological analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This precluded quantitative comparison of interval change in WMH between scans. Regional quantification of WMH in the cadaveric MRI FLAIR sequence was performed using segmentation and localization analyses as previously described (Sudre et al, 2017, 2015; Sudre, Cardoso, & Ourselin, 2017) (see Supplementary Material). This allowed quantification of WMH burden in each lobe and within different cortical and subcortical “layers”, guiding selection of regions for histological analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative WMH load was estimated jointly from both 3D T1 and 3D FLAIR scans using a previously described algorithm (Sudre et al, 2015). Details of the WMH lesion segmentation are provided in the Supplementary Methods.…”
Section: Mri Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of techniques are being used for automated MS lesion segmentation (Anbeek et al, 2004; Brosch et al, 2015, 2016; Deshpande et al, 2015; Dugas-Phocion et al, 2004; Elliott et al, 2013, 2014; Ferrari et al, 2003; Geremia et al, 2010; Havaei et al, 2016; Jain et al, 2015; Jog et al, 2015; Johnston et al, 1996; Kamber et al, 1996; Khayati et al, 2008; Rey et al, 1999, 2002; Roy et al, 2010, 2014b; Schmidt et al, 2012; Shiee et al, 2010; Subbanna et al, 2015; Sudre et al, 2015; Tomas-Fernandez and Warfield, 2011, 2012; Valverde et al, 2017; Weiss et al, 2013; Welti et al, 2001; Xie and Tao, 2011) with several review articles available that describe and evaluate the utility of these methods (García-Lorenzo et al, 2013; Lladó et al, 2012), though semi-automated approaches have also been reported (Udupa et al, 1997; Wu et al, 2006; Zijdenbos et al, 1994). The early work on WML segmentation used the principle of modeling the distributions of intensities of healthy brain tissues and segmenting outliers to those distributions as lesions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%