2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2015.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian nonparametric estimation of test equating functions with covariates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although other approaches based on a BNP models have been proposed (González et al, 2015b; Karabatsos & Walker, 2009a), we take advantage of the ideas in Kottas et al (2005) to obtain equated scores that are defined in the original scale of the tests: The LE method equates scores defined on a discrete scale into scores defined in a discrete scale. This idea, to the best of our knowledge, has not been developed before in the field of equating methods.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although other approaches based on a BNP models have been proposed (González et al, 2015b; Karabatsos & Walker, 2009a), we take advantage of the ideas in Kottas et al (2005) to obtain equated scores that are defined in the original scale of the tests: The LE method equates scores defined on a discrete scale into scores defined in a discrete scale. This idea, to the best of our knowledge, has not been developed before in the field of equating methods.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, Karabatsos and Walker (2009a) proposed a BNP model using Bernstein polynomials process priors for ( F X , F Y ) that account for dependence between the score distributions. As an extension, González et al (2015a, 2015b) developed a BNP model for test equating which allows the use of covariates based on Bernstein polynomials models. Despite the fact that these proposals use more flexible models for the score distributions functions, none of these two approaches produce equated scores that are properly defined on the original discrete scale score.…”
Section: Latent Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this conclusion, using both covariates and anchor items resulted in the smallest standard error of equating over a large range of test scores. The research conducted by Gonzalez et al (2015) revealed that the Bayesian non-parametric model for equating makes many assumptions that used to be vital for test equating unnecessary, demonstrating that even when there is no covariant, equating is possible. Wiberg and von Davier (2017) also stated the effect of covariates in various administrations would aid in the process of ensuring equal testing for test-takers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the relationship between the test and gender is insignificant for the two booklets, but the other relationships are significant. Although the relationship between the test and gender is not significant, it was used in other studies (Branberg & Wiberg, 2011;Gonzalez et al, 2015;Liou et al, 2001, andYurtçu, 2018). It was also taken as a covariate in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation