2003
DOI: 10.1080/02331880310001598837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian one-sample prediction of future observations under Pareto distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying the identity given in Lingappaiah (1981) (or Nigm et al, 2003, which can be proved by induction,…”
Section: The First Case Is When the Scale Parameter C Is Knownmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Applying the identity given in Lingappaiah (1981) (or Nigm et al, 2003, which can be proved by induction,…”
Section: The First Case Is When the Scale Parameter C Is Knownmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first case is when the scale parameter c is known and the second case is when both the shape parameter a and scale parameter c are unknown. Moreover, in Section 3, we also give numerical examples to calculate the Bayesian predictive intervals and compare the lengths of these Bayesian predictive intervals by using the method of Nigm et al (2003) and our proposed method. Finally, some conclusions are made in Section 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A data set of 10, 000 random samples has been drawn from the considered model for a different set of parametric values. The considered value of the sample size n is 15 with censored sample size k (= 4, 8, 12) with numerical values of the parameter θ(= 4,6,8). The constant v is considered to be fixed at unity.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few of those who have been extensively studied recently about the predictive inference for the future observations are Raqab & Madi [9], Nigm et al [6], Sarhan & Tadj [10], Ahmad et al [1] and Prakash & Singh [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%