Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety and Risk (ISGSR 2019) 2019
DOI: 10.3850/978-981-11-2725-0-key5-cd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Perspective on Ground Property Variability for Geotechnical Practice

Abstract: Soils and rocks are natural heterogeneous geo-materials, and their properties exhibit site-specific spatial variability as an outcome of the previous geological processes that the soils and rocks in the site have undergone. Spatial variability of ground properties and other geotechnical uncertainties may be modelled probabilistically using random variables or random field. Some questions are frequently raised by practicing geotechnical engineers when they consider using probabilistic methods. For example, what… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compressive sampling is not derived from the random field model, but originates from signal processing. Some attempts have been made to apply compressive sampling without detrending (Wang Y. et al 2019a) and without assuming stationarity (Wang Y. et al 2019b) as discussed in the preceding section. In fact, when sufficient data are available say in the form of training images, multiple point methods that consider more than two-point autocorrelation information are being explored in geostatistics (Mariethoz and Caers 2015).…”
Section: What Next?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compressive sampling is not derived from the random field model, but originates from signal processing. Some attempts have been made to apply compressive sampling without detrending (Wang Y. et al 2019a) and without assuming stationarity (Wang Y. et al 2019b) as discussed in the preceding section. In fact, when sufficient data are available say in the form of training images, multiple point methods that consider more than two-point autocorrelation information are being explored in geostatistics (Mariethoz and Caers 2015).…”
Section: What Next?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, BCS provides both the best estimate (i.e., the mean of the random field) and the covariance matrix for the signal of interest directly from sparse measurements. developed a BCS-KL random field generator to simulate RFSs directly from sparse measurements and offered a Bayesian perspective of random field modeling of site-specific spatial variability (Wang Y. et al 2019a). The BCS-KL generator is non-parametric and data-driven.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%