2016
DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2014-0055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian state space models for dynamic genetic network construction across multiple tissues

Abstract: Construction of gene-gene interaction networks and potential pathways is a challenging and important problem in genomic research for complex diseases while estimating the dynamic changes of the temporal correlations and non-stationarity are the keys in this process. In this paper, we develop dynamic state space models with hierarchical Bayesian settings to tackle this challenge for inferring the dynamic profiles and genetic networks associated with disease treatments. We treat both the stochastic transition ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability and confidence measures play important roles in omic temporal data not only due to the variations, high noise levels and experimental errors resident in the experiments but also the stochastic nature involved in the biological process. The Bayesian paradigm is very well suited for examining these features and other properties in the temporal data, such as highly correlated inputs (genes, time points) and phenotypes, missing data, and small sample size [ 50 56 ]. In Bayesian models, the parameters are assumed to be random variables and they are associated with some probability distribution, and the posterior probability of these parameters can be expressed as marginal distribution of those remaining parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability and confidence measures play important roles in omic temporal data not only due to the variations, high noise levels and experimental errors resident in the experiments but also the stochastic nature involved in the biological process. The Bayesian paradigm is very well suited for examining these features and other properties in the temporal data, such as highly correlated inputs (genes, time points) and phenotypes, missing data, and small sample size [ 50 56 ]. In Bayesian models, the parameters are assumed to be random variables and they are associated with some probability distribution, and the posterior probability of these parameters can be expressed as marginal distribution of those remaining parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of holistic comparative studies of various dynamic methods, there will be no universally or widely accepted or best methods available for different scenarios under time course experimental designs. Therefore, we recommend the development of a complete analytical pipeline to better characterize dynamic changes and to reduce misleading results (Figure 1) with detailed descriptions for each step) [1,6,10,15,17,19,20,23,25,28,33,44,46,47,[49][50][51][53][54][55]58,59,62,67,68,71,72,[74][75][76]81,[89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103].…”
Section: Single Gene-by-gene Testing For Non-periodical Time Course Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) GRNs in traditional microarrays: Time-varying multivariate state space model (SSM) tool [99] is designed for a short series of time course expression profiles where measurements from samples are collected between sparse and uneven time points. With the combination of Hidden Makov model and Dynamic Bayesian Network, HMDBN tool [95] is proposed by incorporating the non-stationary DBNs in which the structure and parameters are not fixed over a series of time points.…”
Section: Dynamic Machine Learning Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%