1984
DOI: 10.4135/9781412983501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Statistical Inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study the type of distribution varied by parameter, but was consistent with prior experience about which type of distribution would be appropriate for the type and nature of the data available. 91,300 Despite these efforts, the precise definition of parameter distributions for some variables was limited, as in some cases it was difficult to fit a distribution to the few data available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study the type of distribution varied by parameter, but was consistent with prior experience about which type of distribution would be appropriate for the type and nature of the data available. 91,300 Despite these efforts, the precise definition of parameter distributions for some variables was limited, as in some cases it was difficult to fit a distribution to the few data available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For students with limited perceived mathematical aptitude, concepts like significance level, power of a test, sampling distribution, and confidence interval have been difficult to understand fully and interpret correctly (Iversen 1984). The p-value is calculated on the assumption of the null hypothesis (Ho) being true.…”
Section: Teaching Bayes' Rule In a Liberal Arts Statistics Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems possible that when participants are told the disconfirming information comes from the same sample, then variability will serve to moderate the weight given to the prior mean. In this scenario, a more variable distribution may lead people to have a more 'fuzzy' estimate of the central tendency of the original sample, and thus be more likely to revise their beliefs about the central tendencies when they encounter anomalous data (Iversen, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%