2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.108.024047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian test of the mass of the graviton with planetary ephemerides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there is an increasing risk of introducing multiple correlations between the parameters of the theory, as well as between these parameters and those of the solar system (i.e., masses). Given that it can take up to eight hours of computation to adjust the solar system parameters of the ephemeris at a single point in the parameter space (Mariani et al 2023), achieving a densely filled parameter space becomes highly computationally demanding if the parameter space dimension is greater than one. Moreover, the statistical methodology also grows more complex with an increase in the number of parameters to constrain.…”
Section: Tests Of Alternative Theoretical Framework With Planetary Ep...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, there is an increasing risk of introducing multiple correlations between the parameters of the theory, as well as between these parameters and those of the solar system (i.e., masses). Given that it can take up to eight hours of computation to adjust the solar system parameters of the ephemeris at a single point in the parameter space (Mariani et al 2023), achieving a densely filled parameter space becomes highly computationally demanding if the parameter space dimension is greater than one. Moreover, the statistical methodology also grows more complex with an increase in the number of parameters to constrain.…”
Section: Tests Of Alternative Theoretical Framework With Planetary Ep...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this issue, Bernus et al (2019Bernus et al ( , 2020 and Mariani et al (2023) have built planetary ephemerides fully developed in the massive gravity framework of Eq. ( 145) and fitted over the data sample of INPOP17a, INPOP19a and INPOP21a respectively.…”
Section: Massive Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorists usually regard very light and gravitationally coupled Brans-Dicke scalars as poison rather than catnip because of the strong observational constraints they must satisfy, such as from precision measurements within the solar system [2,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. In particular solar system tests constrain the post-Newtonian deviations from the metric predicted by GR -including those due to a Brans-Dicke scalar -to be at most of order 10 −5 [35] (see [36] for a careful treatment of ephemerides when placing such constraints).…”
Section: Jcap03(2024)015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data has also been used to obtain constraints on the local DM and cosmic neutrino densities [148]. Planetary ephemerides released by the Observatory of Paris and the Co te d'Azur Observatory (INPOP) [158,159] have also been used to constrain fifth-force ranges [160] and the effects of a finite graviton mass [161].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%