2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian uncertainty quantification in the evaluation of alloy properties with the cluster expansion method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to the framework developed in Ref. 17 for this. In summary, our task is to obtain κ and X for some data set that we will denote D, and then to solve for the ECIβ.…”
Section: The Cluster Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to the framework developed in Ref. 17 for this. In summary, our task is to obtain κ and X for some data set that we will denote D, and then to solve for the ECIβ.…”
Section: The Cluster Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessary values for convergence depend on the material being simulated. For SiGe, including only 2-point clusters already gives a good fit [33], but for MgLi, clusters with up to 5 points may be necessary [23,33]. This can be seen as well using the RVM, which removes clusters that are not relevant for the fit.…”
Section: Model Trainingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous works employing a Bayesian framework for uncertainty quantification in the CE used a Laplace prior for the expansion coefficients and a right-truncated Poisson prior for the number of clusters to induce sparsity in the number of clusters for the expansion [33]. Despite the generality of this approach, the posterior distribution cannot be sampled analytically and a reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo (RJ-MCMC) [34] had to be used to obtain statistics on the predictions [33]. There are other works based on a Bayesian framework, but they did not exploit the resultant uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These statistical quantities can be found analytically for straightforward cases, but often the use of a numerical technique cannot be avoided. One such a technique is Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling (Beck and Au 2002;Marzouk et al 2007;Kristensen and Zabaras 2014). MCMC techniques are based on drawing samples from a target distribution (here the posterior) and numerically approximating the quantities of interest (e.g.…”
Section: Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods (Mcmc)mentioning
confidence: 99%