Specific imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL1 mutations (Y253H, E255K/V, T315I, F317L, and F359V/C) predict failure of secondline nilotinib or dasatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia; however, such therapy also fails in approximately 40% of patients in the chronic phase of this disease who do not have these resistant mutations. We investigated whether sensitive mutation analysis could identify other poor-risk subgroups. Analysis was performed by direct sequencing and sensitive mass spectrometry on 220 imatinib-resistant patients before they began nilotinib or dasatinib therapy. Patients with resistant mutations by either method (n ؍ 45) were excluded because inferior response was known. Of the remaining 175 patients, 19% had multiple mutations by mass spectrometry versus 9% by sequencing. Compared with 0 or 1 mutation, the presence of multiple mutations was associated with lower rates of complete cytogenetic response (50% vs 21%, P ؍ .003) and major molecular response (31% vs 6%, P ؍ .005) and a higher rate of new resistant mutations (25% vs 56%, P ؍ .0009). Sensitive mutation analysis identified a poor-risk subgroup (15.5% of all patients) with multiple mutations not identified by standard screening. (Blood. 2012;119(10): 2234-2238)
IntroductionMutation analysis is required to aid subsequent therapy selection for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) for whom imatinib therapy fails, 1,2 because certain BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations confer clinical resistance to nilotinib (Y253H, E255K/V, T315I, and F359V/C) 3 or dasatinib (V299L, T315I/A, and F317L/I/ V/C) 4-7 and are associated with poor outcome. 3,7 However, secondline nilotinib or dasatinib therapy also fails in approximately 40% of patients with imatinib-resistant chronic phase (CP) CML without these resistant mutations. 3,7 We examined the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain of imatinib-resistant CML patients before commencing nilotinib/dasatinib therapy using sensitive multiplex mass spectrometry, 8 to determine whether the number of mutations harbored by individual patients impacted subsequent response. Multiple sensitive mutations were associated with poor response and a high rate of new resistant mutations.
MethodsThe patients analyzed were a subset of patients from previously reported studies 3,7,9-11 and have been described formerly. 8 The trials were run in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approvals were obtained from the relevant institutional review boards of all participating institutions. Peripheral blood samples of 220 imatinib-resistant CML patients (CP n ϭ 100, accelerated phase n ϭ 64, blast crisis n ϭ 56) collected before subsequent treatment with nilotinib (n ϭ 89) or dasatinib (n ϭ 131) were investigated. The median follow-up during nilotinib/dasatinib treatment for patients in CP, accelerated phase, and blast crisis was 18 (range 2-33), 12 (range 1-36), and 3 (range 1-27) months, respectively. BCR-ABL1 mutation analysis was performed by direct sequencing (detection limit 10%-20%) 12 and retrospectively...