1963
DOI: 10.1007/bf02046064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus gen. et sp. n., a predatory, ectoparasitic, and bacteriolytic microorganism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
343
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(358 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
12
343
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In soil and water, where B. bacteriovorus is found, a very large fraction of the bacterial community consists of small cells, <0.5 μm in width (58,61,62), not larger than B. bacteriovorus AP cells themselves (12). Our model predicts that B. bacteriovorus would prey successfully on such poorly nutritious prey cells, which may be too small to accommodate a full intracellular growth cycle but do have a limited nutritional value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In soil and water, where B. bacteriovorus is found, a very large fraction of the bacterial community consists of small cells, <0.5 μm in width (58,61,62), not larger than B. bacteriovorus AP cells themselves (12). Our model predicts that B. bacteriovorus would prey successfully on such poorly nutritious prey cells, which may be too small to accommodate a full intracellular growth cycle but do have a limited nutritional value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…BALOs (Bdellovibrio and similar organisms) constitute an exclusive group of obligate predatory Gram-negative bacteria that prey solely on other Gram-negative bacteria (11,12). As such, they are considered as potential biocontrol agents and living antibiotics (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is present in many proteobacteria, including d-proteobacteria and the predatory Myxococcus xanthus (Mö ll and Thanbichler, 2009), but absent from the periplasmic predators, suggesting that the machinery used to synchronously split the predatory filamentous cell (Fenton et al, 2010b) does not simply replicate the binary division apparatus at multiple sites. Other differences between the two types of predators, which are related to growth mechanisms, include the apparent inability to obtain host-independent (HI) mutants from epibiotic predators, in contrast to periplasmic predators (Stolp and Starr, 1963;Barel and Jurkevitch, 2001;Dashiff and Kadouri, 2009). This may be related to the absence of bd108 homologues (bd108 is a gene directly implicated in the HI phenotype); (Cotter and Thomashow, 1992;Wurtzel et al, 2010;Roschanski et al, 2011) in the genomes of B. exovorus JSS and M. aeruginosavorus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Does fragmentation increase the persistence of the prey population? Furthermore, given that B. bacteriovorus has shown potential to protect crops and reduce biofouling [26][27][28][29], it would be useful to know how its effectiveness in structured habitats relates to its effectiveness as measured in well-mixed (unstructured) culture flasks [30][31][32]. In this regard, B. bacteriovorus has also attracted significant interest because of its potential to eradicate bacterial biofilms which are spatially structured at the microscale [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%