Be prepared? An outside-in perspective on the future public sector in Europe

Abstract

This paper takes an outside-in perspective on recent public sector reforms in Europe. It selects three of the most consequential and probable external trends, and then looks at how far management reforms are anticipating them. The conclusion is that European Union government responses to predictable external trends have been limited and unstrategic. Many official studies of climate change and demographic change have been written, but concrete responses such as resource prioritization and relevant public management reforms do not seem to have been substantial. There is a disconnect between mainstream public management reforms and the biggest external pressures public sectors are now beginning to face. Academic public administration has also been slow to respond to these “megatrends,” but has considerable potential for contributing to their amelioration.

Introducing Adaptive Flood Risk Management in England, New Zealand, and the Netherlands: The Impact of Administrative Traditions

“…This effect is reinforced by the internal organization in both countries: much decision‐making power is devolved, leaving regionally based special purpose public agencies and local government to address complex policy implementation with minimal support from the government, other than limited statutory and non‐statutory guidance and insufficient funding. This together with ambiguous signals from government as to its importance as a policy alongside the centrally developed and implemented climate change mitigation policy (e.g., for New Zealand, see Rive & Weeks, ) and in England, the passing off of climate change adaptation to individuals and business, linked to the seizing of business opportunities (Pollitt, ). Where the economy and cost‐effectiveness prevail, it is difficult to justify and legitimize public spending on climate change responses, thus also on adaptive actions.…”

Managerialism Redux?

“…Such selection could, for example, be made strategically, with an eye to the major challenges for the public sector which can be seen to lie ahead (e.g., climate change, demographic change) or, alternatively, or tactically, with a view to preserving the best‐performing parts of the existing public sector. In most EU states neither of these courses has been chosen (Kickert et al., 2013; Pollitt, ; and Vaughan‐Whitehead, ). Instead cuts have been made in an across‐the‐board fashion, or along the lines of least political resistance, or in some combination of these two.…”

The Search for Viability: A practitioner's view of how the Viable Systems Model is helping transform English local government (and why it has passed unrecognised)

“…The financial savings derived by outsourcing continued to provide short‐term benefits to constrained Council budgets. However, an underlying concern, articulated recently by Pollitt (, p. 21), was that authorities concentrating on contracting out were ‘storing up trouble’ for the future, or in other words, their viability was likely to be threatened. Pollitt gives two key reasons for this:…”