Be well: A systems-based wellness intervention using mindfulness in the workplace – A case study

Abstract

Introduction: Healthy work environments are essential in determining improved well-being of Australians. Job stress has been identified as a significant factor in psychological distress. This study evaluated the effect of introducing a systems-based workplace wellness programme using mindfulness in the workplace. Methods: The programme ‘Be Well’ was introduced as part of a systems-based approach to workplace health promotion, and evaluated using sick leave as a proxy for workplace stress, and the stress satisfaction offset score to determine the degree of change in stress and satisfaction. Results: There was significant reduction in sick leave (2014 vs. 2012) (p<.001), and significant improvement in stress satisfaction offset score (p<.05). Logistic regression analysis identified the programme components most predictive of reduced stress and higher job satisfaction. Conclusion: The impacts of a systems-based mindfulness workplace wellness intervention, show significant improvements in workers’ sick leave and changes to stress and satisfaction scores. This study has implications for sector-wide policy change in the workplace.

Cultivating creative workplaces through mindfulness

“…While the research on mindfulness in the workplace is surging (Kristensen, 2018;Purser, 2018;Good et al, 2016;Hülsheger et al, 2018;Levett et al, 2017;Lomas et al, 2017;Vu and Gill, 2018;Yu and Zellmer-Bruhn, 2018;Walsh, 2018), this study specifically examines if mindfulness training contributes to creativity with individuals in a workgroup. It not only explores a real-world work environment, but also addresses a growing concern that much of the mindfulness hype needs to apply more rigorous science and considers many of the recommended design features identified in the most recent prescriptive checklist (Van Dam et al, 2018).…”

Mindfulness and positive activities at work: Intervention effects on motivation‐related constructs, sleep quality, and fatigue

“…This aligns with research designs which focus on evaluating multi‐faceted interventions (e.g. Levett et al, 2019; Mills et al, 2016) which aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the whole intervention rather than understanding the mechanisms through which any specific intervention activity operates. Thus, the so‐called person‐activity fit is defined by how much a person likes and benefits from a certain activity.…”

“…Moreover, there are variations in the purpose of research on PAIs, with some research aiming to understand how they work, while others aim to evaluate the overall effectiveness of a multi‐faceted intervention for a cohort of workers (e.g. Levett, Coughlan, Longridge, Roumeliotis, & Adams, 2019; Mills, Fullagar, & Culbertson, 2016). Our study adopts the latter approach and looks at the impact of combining PAIs with mindfulness on both health impairment (i.e.…”

Finding meaning in our everyday moments: testing a novel intervention to increase employee well-being

“…, 2011). Although most of this research focuses on people's personal lives, recent research also suggests similar interventions may increase positive work outcomes as well (Levett et al. , 2017).…”

“…Often with mindfulness-based interventions, researchers have sought to, with considerable success; increase a variety of well-being indicators, including flourishing, life satisfaction, interpersonal relationships and mental and physical health (Brown et al, 2007;Fjorback et al, 2011). Although most of this research focuses on people's personal lives, recent research also suggests similar interventions may increase positive work outcomes as well (Levett et al, 2017). While the relationship between mindfulness and meaning in life has received some empirical investigation, few studies have examined mindfulness interventions as a way of increasing meaning in life (Dobkin et al, 2016).…”