“…However, other proxy records, such as magnetic susceptibility (MS) (Gao et al, 2019), grain-size distributions (GS) (Lu et al, 2005(Lu et al, , 2013a, soil δ 13 C, total organic carbon (TOC) (Lu et al, 2005(Lu et al, , 2013a, bacterial branched glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) (Duan et al, 2019) and pollens (Chen et al, 2015(Chen et al, , 2020, suggest a 3000-4000 year lagged response of monsoon intensity to peak solar insolation, probably resulting from the retreat of the remaining Northern Hemisphere ice sheet, CO 2 -forced northern high-latitude temperature increases, or the tropospheric temperature variations (Chen et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2014;Lu et al, 2005Lu et al, , 2013a. These conflicting results lead to the debate on whether speleothem δ 18 O values can represent monsoon precipitations and what is the role of Holocene boreal summer insolation on monsoon changes in East Asia (Chen et al, 2015(Chen et al, , 2020Goldsmith et al, 2017;Jiang et al, 2020). The fundamentals of these questions might lie in a more convincing interpretation of different palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental proxies.…”