2011 International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications (ICSOS) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icsos.2011.5783704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beaconless acquisition for ISL and SGL, summary of 3 years operation in space and on ground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one extreme, if the width of the auto-correlation function is larger than the time of one full spiral revolution, this correlates fluctuations between two adjacent tracks and significantly increases the probability of detection. This condition is the typical operational regime of optical communication terminals with a fast beam-steering mirror, large beam intensities in the far field, and correspondingly short integration times [12,14]. In the other extreme, if the width of the auto-correlation is smaller than the time it takes for the beam to sweep past the location of the receiving SC, the integration windows within this period become uncorrelated, which also increases the detection probability.…”
Section: B Previous Models and Scope Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In one extreme, if the width of the auto-correlation function is larger than the time of one full spiral revolution, this correlates fluctuations between two adjacent tracks and significantly increases the probability of detection. This condition is the typical operational regime of optical communication terminals with a fast beam-steering mirror, large beam intensities in the far field, and correspondingly short integration times [12,14]. In the other extreme, if the width of the auto-correlation is smaller than the time it takes for the beam to sweep past the location of the receiving SC, the integration windows within this period become uncorrelated, which also increases the detection probability.…”
Section: B Previous Models and Scope Of This Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to the case of gravitational wave observatories [7], where the very large distance between SC leads to similarly weak powers, although the divergence angle is about 50 times smaller, owing to the much larger telescope size. The parameters of mission scenario (M2) were mostly extracted from [8] and correspond to a typical optical communication terminal in space, such as discussed in [8,12,14], where received powers are between 3 and 6 orders of magnitude higher and integration times correspondingly much shorter.…”
Section: B Reference Mission Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such terminals, the ATP system splits part of the light beam from the signal beam as the beacon light to detect the angle of the incidence light. The signal beam energy obtained by the on-board terminal remains unchanged, but in order to ensure communication Sensors 2020, 20, 5649 2 of 14 quality, the ATP system will not separate too much beam energy from the signal beam, so the energy of the beacon light entering the ATP system is greatly reduced [7][8][9]. How to perform high-precision spot position detection under extremely low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is a problem that must be faced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a beaconless spatial acquisition process, each LCT scans sequentially its uncertainty cone with its highly collimated communications laser beam and aligns its optical axis perpendicularly to the received optical wavefront, based on the optical signal detected by its quadrant photodiode. This Master/Slave sequence is described in detail in [9]. An overview is summarized in Fig.…”
Section: The Beaconless Spatial Acquisition Processmentioning
confidence: 99%