1994
DOI: 10.1017/s007418090010734x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam Combination for Wide Field Imaging

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Several limitations reduce the field of view in radiointerferometry. With an optical array, two of them can be overcome to some extent according to the beam combination method. A beam combination in the pupil plane can completely overcome one of them. In the image plane, a beam combination obeying the rules of geometrical optics can overcome both limitations in principle, but is difficult to achieve in practice. We discuss particularly the real case of a Michelson Stellar Interferometer where a peris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in a Michelson interferometer there is no homothetic relation between the input and output pupils. 2 This means the object-image relationship can no longer be described as a convolution, because the rearrangement of the apertures rearranges the high-spatial frequency part of the object spectrum in the Fourier plane (Tallon & Tallon-Bosc 1992). This has an important consequence for off-axis objects: The image position does not coincide with the white-light fringe position (see Figure 1 in Tallon & Tallon-Bosc 1992).…”
Section: Michelson and Fizeau Interferometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, in a Michelson interferometer there is no homothetic relation between the input and output pupils. 2 This means the object-image relationship can no longer be described as a convolution, because the rearrangement of the apertures rearranges the high-spatial frequency part of the object spectrum in the Fourier plane (Tallon & Tallon-Bosc 1992). This has an important consequence for off-axis objects: The image position does not coincide with the white-light fringe position (see Figure 1 in Tallon & Tallon-Bosc 1992).…”
Section: Michelson and Fizeau Interferometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 This means the object-image relationship can no longer be described as a convolution, because the rearrangement of the apertures rearranges the high-spatial frequency part of the object spectrum in the Fourier plane (Tallon & Tallon-Bosc 1992). This has an important consequence for off-axis objects: The image position does not coincide with the white-light fringe position (see Figure 1 in Tallon & Tallon-Bosc 1992). For a finite spectral bandwidth this means the fringe contrast decreases with field angle and the field of view is limited; the maximum size of an image from a Michelson interferometer is ∼R ≡ λ/ λ resolution elements in diameter.…”
Section: Michelson and Fizeau Interferometersmentioning
confidence: 99%