2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4903457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam envelope calculations in general linear coupled lattices

Abstract: The envelope equations and Twiss parameters (b and a) provide important bases for uncoupled linear beam dynamics. For sophisticated beam manipulations, however, coupling elements between two transverse planes are intentionally introduced. The recently developed generalized CourantSnyder theory offers an effective way of describing the linear beam dynamics in such coupled systems with a remarkably similar mathematical structure to the original Courant-Snyder theory. In this work, we present numerical solutions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behaviour is in full agreement to theoretical predictions from [14] and to tracking simulations with TRACK [20] using magnetic field maps. It is also in agreement with calculations that apply the recently developed 4d-envelope model for coupled lattices [21][22][23][24]. The observed emittance separation under variation of the solenoid field only, confirms that EMTEX is an one-knob tool for adjustable emittance partitioning.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This behaviour is in full agreement to theoretical predictions from [14] and to tracking simulations with TRACK [20] using magnetic field maps. It is also in agreement with calculations that apply the recently developed 4d-envelope model for coupled lattices [21][22][23][24]. The observed emittance separation under variation of the solenoid field only, confirms that EMTEX is an one-knob tool for adjustable emittance partitioning.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this section, we present the method of time-dependent canonical transformation in preparation for the proof of Theorem 1 in the next section. It is necessary to emphasize again that the results and techniques leading to Theorem 1 have been reported previously in the context of charged particle dynamics in a general focusing lattice [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. These contents are included here for easy reference and self-consistency.…”
Section: Methods Of Time-dependent Canonical Transformationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Techniques of normal forms for stable symplectic matrices and horizontal polar decomposition for symplectic matrices are developed to prove Theorem 2. The results and techniques leading to Theorem 1 have been reported previously in the context of charged particle dynamics in a general focusing lattice [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. These contents are included here for easy reference and self-consistency.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is known as spontaneous PT-symmetry breaking. These eigenmode properties have been identified for applications in plasma physics and beam physics [23,24,31,[33][34][35][36].…”
Section: P T H = Hp T (25)mentioning
confidence: 99%