1990
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/35/11/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam hardening of 10 MV radiotherapy X-rays: analysis using a convolution/superposition method

Abstract: Total and primary polyenergetic dose spread arrays (PDSA) have been generated for a high energy 10 MV radiotherapy photon beam using the electron gamma shower (EGS) Monte Carlo code. By considering the attenuation of fluence per energy interval, PDSA have been produced at radiological depths of 0 cm (the surface PDSA) and 40 cm (the beam hardened PDSA). By comparing primary PDSA produced at these different depths, the effect of beam hardening on the PDSA has been quantified. Calculations show that the mean ele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective depth of penetration of charged particlesz for the polyenergetic kernels increased by 21%, going from a depth of 1.5 cm to a depth of 20 cm for a 10 × 10 cm 2 field size (Table I). Metcalfe et al 17 also found that the effective range of charged particles increased for depth-hardened kernels in comparison to the surface kernel. Although the use of depth-dependent polyenergetic kernels has already been studied and shown to improve dose accuracy, no studies, to our knowledge, have investigated the effects of beam softening for larger field sizes and greater offaxis distances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effective depth of penetration of charged particlesz for the polyenergetic kernels increased by 21%, going from a depth of 1.5 cm to a depth of 20 cm for a 10 × 10 cm 2 field size (Table I). Metcalfe et al 17 also found that the effective range of charged particles increased for depth-hardened kernels in comparison to the surface kernel. Although the use of depth-dependent polyenergetic kernels has already been studied and shown to improve dose accuracy, no studies, to our knowledge, have investigated the effects of beam softening for larger field sizes and greater offaxis distances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These primary photon spectra were used to calculate the TERMA for each energy bin, which was then used as weighting factors for combining our highresolution, monoenergetic water kernels into polyenergetic kernels that are specific to a given depth, field size, or off-axis distance. 17 …”
Section: B Calculation Of Polyenergetic Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extension of the source (focus) 28 is approximated by a 2D Gaussian function. In order to take into account the beam hardening with increasing depth 29,30 , the attenuation coefficient μ of the corresponding depth is considered.…”
Section: Determination Of the Primary Fluencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is the single polyenergetic method [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], where the convolution is performed with the use of a single-dose kernel that is formed by use of the incident X-ray spectrum. The other is the components method [3,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15], where a separate convolution is performed that uses each of the multi-dose kernels that are usually formed with the use of effective X-ray spectra, by which the number of energy bins can be decreased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%