2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2012.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam induced deposition of 3D electrodes to improve coupling to cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…resist and is a result of an antecedent lithography process (Ozel et al 2017). Alternatively, assisted deposition can be used to construct the vertical feature from the bottom-up (Martiradonna et al 2012; C. Xie et al 2012).…”
Section: Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…resist and is a result of an antecedent lithography process (Ozel et al 2017). Alternatively, assisted deposition can be used to construct the vertical feature from the bottom-up (Martiradonna et al 2012; C. Xie et al 2012).…”
Section: Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the case of solid inflexible vertical structures coupled to cells with long protrusions, i.e. neuronal cells, a clear directionality effect has been shown as these cells grow on large pillar arrays made of gold (Panaitov et al 2011; Santoro, Panaitov, and Offenhäusser 2014), platinum (Martiradonna et al 2012; Sileo et al 2013), and indium phosphide (Gautam et al 2017). In particular, it has been shown that neuronal cells can grow on vertical structures and form tight junctions at the nanopillar surface.…”
Section: Resolution Of the Cell-vertical Structure Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no studies have attempted to optimize IN-CELL recordings by increasing the size of gMμEs, several laboratories have explored the potential use of nanometric size mushroom shaped electrodes 32 34 36 . These studies are based on the reasoning that nanometric sized mushroom-shaped microelectrodes may be more suitable for interfacing with small (10–20 μm diameter) mammalian neurons than the very large Aplysia neurons (50–80 μm diameter) used in our proof-of-concept studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of the numerous extracellular interface concepts proposed in basic science is limited by problems ranging from improper cell adhesion to inadequate device stability . To overcome such limitations, the design of engineered interfaces , is mainly based on successful application of emerging technologies, such as nanotechnology. The interface between cells and nanostructures has been studied extensively. In particular, the morphology of cells interfacing 3D nanoelectrodes has been investigated in detail, as these are prominent candidates to solve the aforementioned problems. Potential mechanisms for coupling between electrogenic cells and multiple 3D nano- and microstructures are proposed and used for extracellular applications. ,,,, Most of these 3D nano- and microstructures can be classified under two main types: cylindrical pillars with and without a cap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%