2020
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2020.568145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam Monitor Calibration for Radiobiological Experiments With Scanned High Energy Heavy Ion Beams at FAIR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary beam, a pencil beam (with a FWHM of about 1.2 cm), was constantly monitored during the irradiation with a parallel plate ionization chamber [35] while the beam position and focus was verified with Radiochromic films and a light screen. The beam monitor ionization chamber was calibrated in terms of primary particles by a dose measurement as described in detail in [36]. In order to reduce the contribution of back-scattered neutrons and of neutrons produced in the backwards directionthrough the interaction of secondary radiation with the material present in the experimental room and with the walls-dedicated PE shielding was placed in front of the beam dump and under the target position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary beam, a pencil beam (with a FWHM of about 1.2 cm), was constantly monitored during the irradiation with a parallel plate ionization chamber [35] while the beam position and focus was verified with Radiochromic films and a light screen. The beam monitor ionization chamber was calibrated in terms of primary particles by a dose measurement as described in detail in [36]. In order to reduce the contribution of back-scattered neutrons and of neutrons produced in the backwards directionthrough the interaction of secondary radiation with the material present in the experimental room and with the walls-dedicated PE shielding was placed in front of the beam dump and under the target position.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam monitor calibration was performed according to the procedure described by Luoni et al. ( 32 ). For verification of the applied dose, additional absolute dosimetry was performed by measuring the absorbed dose to water using a PTW TM30013 Farmer ionization chamber positioned at the sample depth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed limited quality assurance (QA) on the beam output prior to dosimetry measurements. The QA comprised relative dosimetry, using the methods described by Luoni et al ( 28 ). Specifically, the constancy of the beam output (relative absorbed dose) was measured with a farmer-type ionization chamber (PTW 30010 Farmer Chamber; PTW, Freiburg, Germany), placed at isocenter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%