Beam Offset Detection in Laser Stake Welding of Tee Joints Using Machine Learning and Spectrometer Measurements

Abstract

Laser beam welding offers high productivity and relatively low heat input and is one key enabler for efficient manufacturing of sandwich constructions. However, the process is sensitive to how the laser beam is positioned with regards to the joint, and even a small deviation of the laser beam from the correct joint position (beam offset) can cause severe defects in the produced part. With tee joints, the joint is not visible from top side, therefore traditional seam tracking methods are not applicable since they rely on visual information of the joint. Hence, there is a need for a monitoring system that can give early detection of beam offsets and stop the process to avoid defects and reduce scrap. In this paper, a monitoring system using a spectrometer is suggested and the aim is to find correlations between the spectral emissions from the process and beam offsets. The spectrometer produces high dimensional data and it is not obvious how this is related to the beam offsets. A machine learning approach is therefore suggested to find these correlations. A multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), support vector machine (SVM), learning vector quantization (LVQ), logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT) and random forest (RF) were evaluated as classifiers. Feature selection by using random forest and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGAII) was applied before feeding the data to the classifiers and the obtained results of the classifiers are compared subsequently. After testing different offsets, an accuracy of 94% was achieved for real-time detection of the laser beam deviations greater than 0.9 mm from the joint center-line.

A Portable Tool for Spectral Analysis of Plant Leaves That Incorporates a Multichannel Detector to Enable Faster Data Capture

“…The MLP method was selected due to its ability to describe intricate interactions between inputs and outputs, making it particularly advantageous in spectral analysis cases where the relationships may exhibit nonlinear behavior. Furthermore, the MLP approach possesses the capacity to extrapolate from a restricted amount of training data [37][38][39]. In this particular instance, the MLP model comprises nine neurons in the input layer, two hidden layers, and nine neurons in the output layer, as can be seen in Figure 5.…”

Machine Learning in Manufacturing towards Industry 4.0: From ‘For Now’ to ‘Four-Know’

“…Process monitoring [40] Root cause analysis of process failure [41], Process modelling [42] Process fault prediction [43], Process characteristics prediction [44] Self-optimizing process planning [45], Adaptive process control [46] Machine Machine tool monitoring [47] Fault diagnosis [48], Downtime prediction [49] RUL prediction [50], Tool wear prediction [51] Adaptive compensation of errors [52,53],…”

Monitoring laser weld penetration status from the optical signal

“…Notably, researchers have extensively studied spectrometer signals to advance research on welding processes. Jadidi et al [1] demonstrated the potential of spectrometers in establishing correlations between spectral emissions and beam offsets, enabling the monitoring and optimization of welding parameters. Lee et al [2] illustrated the capacity of spectrometers to effectively classify welding imperfections by analyzing emission spectra, thereby aiding in the identification and categorization of defects including underfill and bead separation defects.…”