1969
DOI: 10.1109/taes.1969.309952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam Shape Loss and Surveillance Optimization for Pencil Beam Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the papers start from a radar range equation so that it is difficult to discern the meaning of the calculated losses from a radar design point of view. The hexagonal search pattern was found to be slightly better than the square search pattern [3,4]. The present work shows the hexagonal search to be 0.5 to 1 dB better.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…None of the papers start from a radar range equation so that it is difficult to discern the meaning of the calculated losses from a radar design point of view. The hexagonal search pattern was found to be slightly better than the square search pattern [3,4]. The present work shows the hexagonal search to be 0.5 to 1 dB better.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…There is relatively little literature about beam straddle losses for an ESA [2,3,4]. In Evans, Hahn, and Hank, the loss is correctly found using statistical averaging (probability of detection averaging rather than power averaging) but only four beams are considered when calculating the losses for a volume search.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, several works have explored various approaches for beam synthesis, waveform computation or optimization of the radar scan pattern (for a pencil-beam lattice over the surveillance space [13], adaptive activation strategies on a predesigned radar scan pattern [11]). Those approaches however do not fully use active radars capabilities to dynamically perform beam-forming and are not integrated in a more global framework.…”
Section: A Challenges and Proposed Approachementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the beam spacing increases, the total number of the beams decreases. This results in the reduction of a scan time, but the cost is increase of a beamshape loss [2][3][4]. The beamshape loss is introduced because the target is not always at the center of the beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%