2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2018.8647890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam Training and Data Transmission Optimization in Millimeter-Wave Vehicular Networks

Abstract: Future vehicular communication networks call for new solutions to support their capacity demands, by leveraging the potential of the millimeter-wave (mm-wave) spectrum. Mobility, in particular, poses severe challenges in their design, and as such shall be accounted for. A key question in mm-wave vehicular networks is how to optimize the trade-off between directive Data Transmission (DT) and directional Beam Training (BT), which enables it. In this paper, learning tools are investigated to optimize this trade-o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, we show the training progress of DR-VAE in terms of average ELBO, KL divergence, spectral efficiency and BT overhead (percentage of the frame duration used for BT). We compare different frameworks to learn the transition model: the proposed DR-VAE, the naive approach (see (6)) and the Baum-Welch algorithm [11]. Observations the decoupling of policy design and mobility learning via the dual-timescale approach: we can thus train multiple mobility models simultaneously and use the prior belief generated based on any one of the mobility models.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, we show the training progress of DR-VAE in terms of average ELBO, KL divergence, spectral efficiency and BT overhead (percentage of the frame duration used for BT). We compare different frameworks to learn the transition model: the proposed DR-VAE, the naive approach (see (6)) and the Baum-Welch algorithm [11]. Observations the decoupling of policy design and mobility learning via the dual-timescale approach: we can thus train multiple mobility models simultaneously and use the prior belief generated based on any one of the mobility models.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…transmitted by the UE to the BS in the last slot of the DT phase (at time t = k + T DT − 1). As in (11) for the BT feedback, Y = j denotes active SBPI detected, whereas Y = ∅ denotes inactive SBPI detection, due to either loss of alignment or blockage. Similarly to (11), = B I at the 2nd last slot (t = k + T DT −2) can be computed as a special case of ( 14) and ( 15) with |S BT | = 1 (since in the DT phase only one beam j is used for data transmission) and κL in place of L (since only κL symbols are used as pilot signal), yielding the probability of incorrectly detecting an active SBPI as…”
Section: E Beam-training (Bt) and Data Transmission (Dt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we contend and demonstrate numerically that learning and exploiting such information via adaptive communications can greatly improve the performance of mm-wave networks [10]. In our previous work [6], we bridged this gap by leveraging worst-case mobility information to design beam-sweeping and data communication schemes; in [11], we designed adaptive strategies for BT/DT that leverage a Markovian mobility model via POMDPs, but with no consideration of blockage (hence no handover).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sq ℓ,k ← Sq ℓ,k + γ 2 20: [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], which is the best optimistic estimate of the average rewards of the nodes. The second part is the beam measurement for the selected node (line 14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%