The 6th 2013 Biomedical Engineering International Conference 2013
DOI: 10.1109/bmeicon.2013.6687642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beamforming complexity reduction methods for low-cost FPGA-based implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve this problem, a higher performance GPU is needed, e.g., a GPU with higher numbers of CUDA cores, such as 1536 or 3072 cores, which are already available in modern graphics cards. Rather than increase the CUDA cores, reducing the beamform dynamic focusing points [12] or applying pseudo-dynamic beamforming [13] could be an economic solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To solve this problem, a higher performance GPU is needed, e.g., a GPU with higher numbers of CUDA cores, such as 1536 or 3072 cores, which are already available in modern graphics cards. Rather than increase the CUDA cores, reducing the beamform dynamic focusing points [12] or applying pseudo-dynamic beamforming [13] could be an economic solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of focal points is also reduced to save the FPGA memory, e.g., instead of focusing on every point on the scanline, the scanline is divided into windows, and each window has only one focal point. Moreover, the size of the windows also increases along the depth to further reduce the focal points [12]. Because of using one focal point per window, other points in that window are out of focus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This flaw is addressed by the NLMS algorithm. In [10], the authors proposed two approaches for simplifying dynamic receive beamforming so that it may be performed on a single 500K gate FPGA. The first technique employs a fixed window size, whereas the second utilises a dynamic window size that equalises off-focus beamforming delay errors between windows at various depths.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Podemos optar entre muchas formas de composición de imagen en función de cómo se realice la insonificación, la adquisición, o cómo se combinen las señales recogidas (Szabo, 2004). El problema clásico de conformación de haces en recepción y tiempo real para un array de N elementos e I puntos en la imagen tiene un nivel de complejidad O(N × I), y a día de hoy se han desarrollado distintos tipos de soluciones tanto a nivel de hardware (Siritan and et al, 2013;Wall and Lockwood, 2005;Camacho and et al, 2007), como de software (So et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified