2006
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BEAMing: single-molecule PCR on microparticles in water-in-oil emulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
381
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
381
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…New amplicons of smaller size were designed for the DNA purified from paraffin-embedded samples. When sequencing chromatograms were difficult to interpret in the DNA purified from tumor samples, we reevaluated the mutation in question either by cloning the PCR product and sequencing individual clones or by performing a BEAMing assay (27,28). Additional, more detailed methods are described in SI Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New amplicons of smaller size were designed for the DNA purified from paraffin-embedded samples. When sequencing chromatograms were difficult to interpret in the DNA purified from tumor samples, we reevaluated the mutation in question either by cloning the PCR product and sequencing individual clones or by performing a BEAMing assay (27,28). Additional, more detailed methods are described in SI Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations present in a smaller fraction can generally not be distinguished from the background in sequencing chromatograms. To determine whether the mutations were present in a smaller but still sizable fraction of the tumor cell population, we evaluated a subset of the DNA samples via BEAMing (beads, emulsions, amplifications, magnetics) assay (see SI Methods) (27,28). We performed 20 BEAMing assays in seven patients, focusing on those mutations that appeared to be present in late-stage lesions but not in an earlier-stage lesion of the same patient (e.g., present in metastasis but not in the advanced colorectal carcinoma).…”
Section: Quantification Of the Level Of Mutations In Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the PCR-products are double-stranded, a strand separation needs to be performed to isolate the single-stranded aptamers. Both requirements can be fulfilled by the use of BEAMing (Beads, Emulsion, Amplification, Magnetic), a combination of emulsion-PCR and solid phase-coupling according to Diehl and Hünniger [18,19]. Briefly, an according to the requirements modified Forward-Primer (5 -aminated or 5 -biotinylated), a Reverse-Primer coupled to magnetic beads and the other PCR components (polymerase, buffer, dNTPs, template and water) were mixed.…”
Section: Beamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These biomarkers have been explored as dynamic tools for monitoring response to systemic therapies and addressing the challenges posed by therapeutic resistance and intratumor genetic heterogeneity. In this way, the sensitive "BEAMing technique" (beads, emulsification, amplification, and magnetics) has demonstrated its ability for detecting and quantifying driver somatic mutations in plasma for breast and colorectal cancers [33,34]. As an example of the BEAMing technique, PIK3CA mutational status in plasma ctDNA and tumor tissues was concordant when samples were obtained simultaneously; however, when years elapsed from removal of tumor and the blood draw, discordant results were seen in as many as 20% of patients, demonstrating that biomarkers may change over time and clonal evolution may be one of the reasons.…”
Section: Pilot Studies Of Circulating Tumor Dna To Measure Tumor Genomentioning
confidence: 99%