2009
DOI: 10.3221/igf-esis.07.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bearing capacity of mixed soil model

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The main objective of this research is the improvement of red soil by the addition of construction materials. This method could provide a scientific way to create a soil foundation with sufficient stability against geo-technical problems or instabilities. Laboratory tests have been conducted to characterize the behavior of red soil when amended with different types of gravels, soils and sand under compacted conditions with Optimum Moisture Content (OMC). Safe bearing capacity of all models have been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Result of liquid limit of red soil [11] Form the evaluation of mixed soil types 2 (consist of 55% red soil and 45% of light brown soil), mixed soil types 3(made up from 55% of red soil and 45% of black soil) and mixed soil types 4 (developed from 55% red soil and 45% of green soil) which are with lowest cohesion and from mineralogy evaluation of these three mixed soil types could be conclude the mixed soil types 2 and 3 due to availability of carbonate mineral could be observed of significantly reducing soil cohesion and in the mixed soil type 4 also one or more minerals presented in the green soil which have negative affected on the soil cohesion, and in this regard could be investigate later.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Result of liquid limit of red soil [11] Form the evaluation of mixed soil types 2 (consist of 55% red soil and 45% of light brown soil), mixed soil types 3(made up from 55% of red soil and 45% of black soil) and mixed soil types 4 (developed from 55% red soil and 45% of green soil) which are with lowest cohesion and from mineralogy evaluation of these three mixed soil types could be conclude the mixed soil types 2 and 3 due to availability of carbonate mineral could be observed of significantly reducing soil cohesion and in the mixed soil type 4 also one or more minerals presented in the green soil which have negative affected on the soil cohesion, and in this regard could be investigate later.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of soil mechanical properties occurred because of the soil mixture. The change soil mechanical properties influenced to safe bearing capacity of soil foundation 3,4 . In the present paper, linear regression analysis and histogram were employed for the assessment of the frequency of safe bearing capacity of soil foundation.…”
Section: Applied Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the construction materials economically was assessed to realize methods for manufacture economic construction materials for soil foundation and concrete structure 1 . To achieve the economical safe bearing capacity of soil foundation, the mechanical properties of the soil foundation have been assumed in the analytical process, and soil mixture was employed to modify mechanical properties of the soil, 2,3 to evaluate soil foundation safe bearing capacity the dimension of concrete footing evaluated in associate with soil mixture design in the analytical process 4 . The mechanical properties of the soil in controlling safe bearing capacity were analyzed using shaking table test investigated; however, improper selection mechanical properties of the soil accelerate liquefaction probability 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aboratory experimental activity was performed for the characterization of red soil in soil mixture process and the assessment of soil mixture mechanical properties was performed for developing acceptable safe bearing capacity [1]. The bearing capacity of mixed soil foundation was investigated by changing the concrete footing dimensions and the soil mechanical properties systematically [2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%