2013
DOI: 10.1680/geot.12.p.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bearing capacity on sand overlying clay soils: a simplified conceptual model

Abstract: The derivation of a new conceptual model for predicting the peak penetration resistance of circular footings installed vertically into sand overlying soft clay is presented in this paper. Based on visualisation experiments and finite-element analyses, a failure mechanism of a frustum of sand being forced into the underlying clay, with the outer angle reflecting the dilation in the sand, is assumed. The analytical basis of the new conceptual model follows the approach for silo analysis, and takes into account t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For assessing spudcan penetration resistance in a sandover-clay layering system, four existing design methods are compared in this study, including: (a) load spread method; (b) punching shear method; (c) the method by Lee et al (2013aLee et al ( , 2013b, referred to herein as the ' Lee et al method'; and (d) the method by Hu et al, (2014aHu et al, ( , 2014bHu et al, ( , 2015, referred to herein as the 'Hu et al method'. The first two methods are recommended in the current design guidelines -ISO standard 19905-1 (ISO, 2012)while the other two were proposed recently.…”
Section: Design Methods Existing Design Methods For Sand-over-clay: Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For assessing spudcan penetration resistance in a sandover-clay layering system, four existing design methods are compared in this study, including: (a) load spread method; (b) punching shear method; (c) the method by Lee et al (2013aLee et al ( , 2013b, referred to herein as the ' Lee et al method'; and (d) the method by Hu et al, (2014aHu et al, ( , 2014bHu et al, ( , 2015, referred to herein as the 'Hu et al method'. The first two methods are recommended in the current design guidelines -ISO standard 19905-1 (ISO, 2012)while the other two were proposed recently.…”
Section: Design Methods Existing Design Methods For Sand-over-clay: Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is termed as 'punch-through' failure, implying a rapid rate of penetration. New mechanism-based design methods (Lee et al, 2013a(Lee et al, , 2013bHu et al, 2014aHu et al, , 2014bHu et al, , 2015 have recently been proposed for estimating the peak bearing capacity in the surface sand layer and the bearing capacity in the underlying clay layer. However, their applicability in multi-layer soils with an overlying clay layer (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason lies in that the increasing bearing capacity of the foundation induced by a soil plug trapped below the spudcan is not accounted for in the guideline. A new calculation method accounting for the new failure mechanism was first proposed by Lee et al [54] and was further improved by Hu et al [55]. The peak resistance is the sum of the frictional resistance in sand and the bearing capacity of the underlying clay (the first term in eq.…”
Section: Penetration Of Spudcans (1) Bearing Capacity Failure In Unifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new conceptual model has been derived, based on this, and is detailed in Lee et al (2013). This paper also discusses the effect of having a surcharge above the sand layer.…”
Section: Development Of a New Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%