1991
DOI: 10.1109/78.80780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bearing estimation without calibration for randomly perturbed arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Toeplitz approximation method can be used to decrease the estimation error of the general correlation matrix [12] : However, if the linear array is non-uniform, the correlation matrices ( ) p f R of different frequency bins may not satisfy the Toeplitz condition, so the Toeplitz approximation method cannot be applied directly. In this situation, a special focusing matrix should be designed to transform the non-uniform array steering vector into a uniform array model approximately.…”
Section: Direction-free Rss Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Toeplitz approximation method can be used to decrease the estimation error of the general correlation matrix [12] : However, if the linear array is non-uniform, the correlation matrices ( ) p f R of different frequency bins may not satisfy the Toeplitz condition, so the Toeplitz approximation method cannot be applied directly. In this situation, a special focusing matrix should be designed to transform the non-uniform array steering vector into a uniform array model approximately.…”
Section: Direction-free Rss Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain satisfactory results, a large number of sampling snapshots are required for cumulants domain processing. As is well known that the signal covariance matrix R 2 of an ideal ULA is Toeplitz [13], so do R 4 . However, in the case of finite snapshots, the above desired properties cannot be preserved.…”
Section: The Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the similar expression between R 2 and R 4 , we reconstruct a Toeplitz matrix R̂ 4 T from R 4 in the minimum metric distance sense by solving the following optimization problem [13]: minR4TSnormalTbold-italicR4Tbold-italicR4where S T is the set of Toeplitz matrices. The TAM of [14] demonstrates that the optimal approximating Toeplitz matrix R̂ 4 T has the basic entries given below truezˆh=(2N1h+1)1p=12N1h+1rˆp0.1emfalse(p+h1false)where the element r̂ p ( p + h −1) is the p th row and ( p + h − 1)th column of R̂ 4 , h ∈ [1, 2 N − 1].…”
Section: The Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the DOA estimation methods may deteriorate significantly without array manifold calibration. [1][2][3][4][5][6] In this paper, we focus on the mutual coupling calibration and DOA estimation problem for deterministic signals. Various array calibration methods have been proposed with respect to the mutual coupling effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%