“…Specific variability analyses included:
- the standard deviation of normal‐to‐normal RR and QT intervals (SDNN_RR and SDNN_QT in all ECG leads, respectively);
- several other time and frequency domain indices of RR interval variability, including the very low (0.0–0.04 Hz), low (0.04–0.15 Hz), high (0.15–0.40 Hz), and total (0.0–0.40 Hz) frequency powers of RR interval variability in natural log‐transformed units (ln ms2/Hz) calculated using autoregression (lnAR) and the Lomb periodogram method (lnLo) (Schlegel et al., 2010);
- the QT variability index (QTVI) (Atiga et al., 1998), using the means and variances of the RR interval (Piccirillo et al., 2007) rather than those of the heart rate (Berger et al., 1997) in the denominator of the QTVI equation; and
- the “unexplained” part of QTV (Solaimanzadeh et al, 2008; Starc & Schlegel, 2008), wherein the QTV signal is decomposed into two parts, one being described by the concomitant RR interval HRV and/or by the concomitant variability of the QRS‐T angle and the other representing the “unexplained” part of QTV. Decomposition is performed according to a model (Solaimanzadeh et al, 2008; Starc & Schlegel, 2008) that takes into account the hysteresis‐like properties of QT interval dynamics (Lang, Flapan, & Nielsen, 2001) as also the fact that while changes in QT intervals are predominantly driven by changes in RR intervals (Almeida et al, 2006), they can also occur in response to changes in QT wavefront direction descriptors, such as in the QRS‐T angle or equivalent (Acar, Yi, Hnatkova, & Malik, 1999; Kors, van Herpen, & Bemmel, 1999).
…”