Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Project ECHO® is a virtual, interprofessional, cased-based peer-learning model. To date, no studies have explored ECHO as a model for pediatric feeding education. This study examined the outcomes of establishing a pediatric feeding ECHO network. Using a prospective, mixed-methods design, two cohorts of allied health professionals were recruited. Each cohort participated in eight, 90-min videoconference sessions incorporating a didactic presentation and clinical case presentation. The case was presented by a participant, with questions and recommendations provided by the ECHO network. Participants completed: (1) a learning needs analysis before the ECHO series, (2) a self-reported confidence questionnaire pre, post, and 3-month post, (3) a satisfaction questionnaire after each session, and (4) an overall satisfaction questionnaire post-ECHO series. Time spent by hospital allied health clinicians providing impromptu phone/email feeding support to external clinicians was recorded for 8 weeks prior to and 8 weeks during the ECHO series. Forty-seven participants were included in the study, attending an average of 5.8 sessions. Significant improvements in self-reported confidence were observed across the three time points (p < 0.01) with less experienced participants demonstrating greater improvements. Participants reported high satisfaction with ECHO, with 93% (40/43) wanting continued access to ECHO in future. The multidisciplinary format, interactivity, structure, and case-based nature of ECHO were considered beneficial. A 75% reduction in requests for support from clinicians in the same catchment area was noted during the ECHO series. Results demonstrated that Project ECHO is a viable model for pediatric feeding education for clinicians working in the field. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term effects and impacts on clinical care.
Project ECHO® is a virtual, interprofessional, cased-based peer-learning model. To date, no studies have explored ECHO as a model for pediatric feeding education. This study examined the outcomes of establishing a pediatric feeding ECHO network. Using a prospective, mixed-methods design, two cohorts of allied health professionals were recruited. Each cohort participated in eight, 90-min videoconference sessions incorporating a didactic presentation and clinical case presentation. The case was presented by a participant, with questions and recommendations provided by the ECHO network. Participants completed: (1) a learning needs analysis before the ECHO series, (2) a self-reported confidence questionnaire pre, post, and 3-month post, (3) a satisfaction questionnaire after each session, and (4) an overall satisfaction questionnaire post-ECHO series. Time spent by hospital allied health clinicians providing impromptu phone/email feeding support to external clinicians was recorded for 8 weeks prior to and 8 weeks during the ECHO series. Forty-seven participants were included in the study, attending an average of 5.8 sessions. Significant improvements in self-reported confidence were observed across the three time points (p < 0.01) with less experienced participants demonstrating greater improvements. Participants reported high satisfaction with ECHO, with 93% (40/43) wanting continued access to ECHO in future. The multidisciplinary format, interactivity, structure, and case-based nature of ECHO were considered beneficial. A 75% reduction in requests for support from clinicians in the same catchment area was noted during the ECHO series. Results demonstrated that Project ECHO is a viable model for pediatric feeding education for clinicians working in the field. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term effects and impacts on clinical care.
Introduction The rise of formal degree programs has significantly expanded professional and independent paramedicine systems globally. Paramedicine now includes a wide range of responsibilities, from managing life-threatening conditions to addressing diverse patient needs. However, current education frameworks often lack specificity, being largely adapted from other clinical disciplines. This study aims to provide a comprehensive description of the current state of undergraduate paramedic education concerning paediatric content in Australia. Methods A content analysis was conducted on publicly available curriculums from accredited Australian universities offering Bachelor of Paramedicine programs. Initial data analysis involved searching for paediatric terminology in learning outcomes and/or synopses. Subsequent analysis of curricula from institutions that completed member checking comprised two components: a descriptive arm to quantitatively assess paediatric education and an inductive arm to qualitatively explore categories of paediatric curriculum. Results Curriculum of 15/16 programs were searched, revealing a median of three units which included paediatric terminology in learning outcomes or unit synopses. Four institutions across five Australian states completed member checking, revealing a national median paediatric content inclusion of 0%. Only 32% of units included any paediatric content, with a median inclusion of 10%. Examination of the hidden aspects of curriculum highlighted discrepancies between learning outcomes and paediatric content percentages. No overarching degree learning outcomes mentioned paediatrics. Unit learning outcomes that had paediatric mention were categorised into three groups: content, conceptual understanding and skills development. Additionally, distribution analysis revealed a notable emphasis on non-technical skills, potentially overshadowing core knowledge essential for paediatric care. Discussion The findings underscore the need for curriculum reform, to enhance paramedic student preparedness to manage paediatrics. Scaffolding paediatric content into the curriculum could foster a comprehensive understanding of patient care and mitigate disparities in paediatric management. Collaboration with stakeholders and innovative teaching methodologies hold promise for advancing paediatric education in paramedicine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.